Wednesday

Trump Accuser Elizabeth Jean Carroll's Contradictions & Admitted Motive

Quick Note:  This was written  by a registered Democrat who was raised to be a JFK Democrat & an FDR Democrat.  In fact, he studied economics under one of JFK's ad hoc economic advisors.  In addition, the person who wrote this discourse never owned a MAGA cap.  In fact, he lives in a northern American metropolis, and NOT in the backwoods of the former Confederate Deep South.

And it came to pass:  The jury consisting of residents of a federal district that prejudicially hates pro-life presidential candidate Donald Trump awarded an extremely pro-abortion woman $83 million in defamation damages.  Yet, she had no forensic evidence of any kind, in an accusation she claimed to have happened 27 years ago.  She also had ZERO on-the-scene witnesses in the same.  Thus, we have too much of a coincidence at the outset.  None the less ...

The plaintiff only asked the Southern District of New York to grant her approximately ten million dollars in compensatory & punitive damages, because Donald Trump called her mentally ill.  My assessment of her ... of that particular female public figure who is subject to NY Times v Sullivan, 376 US 254, and who is therefore unable to sue any private citizen, on account of any private citizen's public opinion of her ... is much worse.  This is because, if I thought that she were mentally ill, as opposed to malicious & manipulative, as well as sexually crass & void of decency, then I would have a moral duty to extend charity toward her.  However, there is a MASSIVE difference between Malice and Mental Illness.

None the less, any other adjectives used to correctly describe E Jean Carroll are reserved for private conversation, and NOT for printed text.  However, many more adjectives & nouns do apply.

It should read, "Too many good TV shows on Sunday."  Plus, it's interesting that she mentioned "God" on a Sunday, as she shows no signs of being a Sunday church-goer.  BTW, I never watched the Apprentice or Falcon Crest or Dallas or Dynasty or Breaking Bad or Beverly Hills 90210 or Desperate Housewives or West Wing or Game of Thrones or Fargo or ER, etc.

Above:  The Year 2012 minus 1996 = 16 years.  The Year 2023 minus the Year 2012 = 11 years.  16 + 11 = 27 years ago.   The pertinent point is that, in a 2023 Southern District of NY courtroom, it was testified that, as soon as E. Jean Carroll saw ... for the first time ... the Apprentice, she went into severe mental & emotional trauma.  Yet, outside of that courtroom she claimed to have been a MASSIVE Apprentice fan, where the star of the show was Donald Trump.  This is a credibility destroyer.  Contradictions usually are.  To contradict oneself in court is known as "committing perjury."

None the less, it looks like a NYC jury became drunk on power and thought that it could award any amount of money it wanted to designate, mindless of the concept of unjust enrichment.  This is why appeals courts exist.  Even at that, it appeared that the jury of Carroll v Trump 2.0 wanted to punish Trump for not cow-towing to the May 11, 2023 verdict.  

Well, that case was still under appeal at the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, in 2023.  This meant that the legal doctrine of collateral estoppel could not yet take effect ... unless the 2nd Circuit Court of Banana Peals made a ruling that was never reported.  Someone misinformed the jury.  The bottom line is that one case was not even finished, while another case was started-up.  That looks a lot like harassment ... and vexatious litigation.

For the record, the Spring of 2023 case is/was 1:22-cv-10016-LAK.   The judgment is Document 178.  The Notice of Appeal is Document 179.  There was an error in doing the appeal paperwork.  However, it was amended.  

Of course, Trump Hater, Reid Hoffman, was said to have funded Carroll, in her legal adventures.  Confusion then arose when Carroll said that she was only going to need to pay her law team if and only if she won her case.  Such a thing is a Contingent Basis, aka a Contingency Fee Agreement.  Concerning the contradiction here, it's times like this one when you toss your hands up in the air, and walk away from your files, thinking "What's the use?  Who's telling the truth, anyway?  I quit.

Even at that, in a civil trial the jury is not required to hold the same scrutiny as one would hold in a criminal court jury.  In a civil trial, the standard is "the preponderance of the evidence where at least 51% of the evidence favors the plaintiff."

In a criminal trial, the benchmark of judgment is a point known as "proof beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty."  If there is a reasonable doubt in any criminal trial, then the jury is instructed to declare the defendant not guilty.  An American jury is not to declare such a person as "innocent"; only "not guilty."

Civil trials are not that stringent in rendering a jury verdict.  None the less, the burden of proof (aka the ONUS of proof) is still on the plaintiff.  So, where is Carroll's "clear & convincing evidence?"  

It's NOT a matter of concluding that something could have possibly happened in a department store dressing room in 1994 or 1995 or 1996."  Needed was evidence to show that something definitely did occur, with Donald Trump being in the area where the "something" definitely happened. 

Thus, needed was [1] at least the proof that Trump and Carroll were certainly at the same place at the same time, in 1994 or 1995 or 1996 ... [2] that a physical assault of a sexual variety actually did occur at the department store in 1994 or 1995 or 1996 ... or at least upon Carroll in 1994 or 1995 or 1996.  

Concerning this, sometimes a sexual assault victim takes a nearby item, to prove that she was in her aggressor's home or near his person etc.  So, where is the physical evidence, to prove that Trump "raped" Carroll?  Why did she take so long to write or speak about it, if it actually did happen?   All that is known is that FOUR body language experts analyzed Trump during his deposition, and they concluded that Trump most certainly was telling the truth.  The report even mentioned "micro-gestures" where Trump was said to have been "disgusted" with the subject matter.

Moreover, a huge tale sign was in Trump freely and repeatedly saying the word, "rape."  A person who actually did commit rape, according to the expert analysts, refrains from using the word, "rape."  A guy innocent of such a charge, rattles off the word, rape, without reserve.  That video is already linked here, in a list of linked videos pertinent to the Carroll/Trump case.

Going into detail on either of the two Carroll trials is beyond the scope of this discourse, however, on account of time and space already consumed.  None the less, simply because someone said something on the witness stand, it doesn't mean that that person was telling the truth.

Concerning mainstream media's writers, editors, and mouthpieces:   Do "they" not know that reasonable  Americans are "on to them?"  And then comes the unreasonable Americans.  They do NOT think for themselves.  They're puppets ... sheep ... programmed robots.

And concerning Donald Trump, he has spent the past 7 1/2 years sabotaging himself.  The details are beyond the scope of this discourse, due to time & space.  

None the less, a quick example is that of Trump appointing Jeff Sessions as the AG.  Firstly, this caused the Mueller Investigation, being that Jeff recused himself from the Russia investigation.  And secondly, Session's absence from the Senate caused the Republican Party to lose the Senate.  That was super fatal for a Donald Trump who most certainly did have successes during his presidency which benefitted America.  

However, some of Mr. Trump's presidential track record . . .  namely the rise of the US National Debt ... was the Same Old Same Ole.  And of course, the national debt skyrocketed under Bush II, Obama, and Trump.  Even at that, from the emergence of COVID onward, Trump's presidency must be regarded as a sabotaged presidency.  

Mainstream Media in 2020:  The Inciters of Riot after Riot after Riot after Riot

The mainstream commercial media damns and mocks Donald Trump, in everything about him.  In this endless condemning of Trump, there is one blatant observation which shows that these people do not believe that they're telling the truth.   It's the blatant fact that they do NOT let Donald Trump defend himself in detail, on the air, on their less-than-intellectual news & commentary shows.  

If Trump is so evil, mentally deficient, & dangerous to Planet Earth, the mainstream media would have gone out of its way to bring Trump before television cameras, to show how "evil," how "mentally deficient," how "racist," and how "dangerous" he is.  But, the mainstreamers of the media did NOT employ the decency of doing so.  These media personnel are nothing more than hit-and-run cowards who mock Trump and then run and hide.  

These mainstream networks need to be stripped of their FCC licensing.  After all, all that they did in 2020 was incite riots, while withholding all exculpatory evidence from the viewing public.  Inciting riot after riot is a criminal offense after criminal offense.  There media personnel should be criminally indicted and prosecuted, pursuant to the Nuremberg Caselaw Authority.  

An example of the deadly dishonesty of the mainstream media is presented in the video linked directly below.  If you are a manipulative & avowed liar, you are too cowardly to watch it from beginning to end ... or you will obsess yourself with finding something within it, to condemn Donald Trump:

https://www.thefallofminneapolis.com/

For the record, this discourse has been written by a registered Democrat who was raised to be an FDR & JFK Democrat.  The writer of this discourse does NOT own or wear a MAGA hat.  The same writer ... of this discourse ... was also taught college-level econ by one of JFK's "ad hoc" economic advisors.  He even scored a 100% in a national accounting exam ... in the 1980s ... issued by none other than Harvard.  None the less, he asserts that Harvard is entirely over-rated.  Numerous colleges throughout America require discipline, the ability to read, and the ability of juxtapose numbers well.  To graduate from those schools is impressive, also.

All in all, "Harvard Worship" has got to end.  It's not the school that matters as much as the major which the student pursues that matters.  There are worthless majors, per se.  There are also majors which are formidable tasks, no matter which school you are attending.

Back to Donald Trump who is hated by the mainstream media, only because he's pro-life

From November 2016 to 2021, Trump kept sabotaging himself.  Yet, he did have successes as president.  More importantly, any adult over 35 years of age in America who is not afflicted with a brain injury would make a far better president than Biden.  Biden is definitely a danger to America.  Biden is a Pathological Liar.  Biden is an insult to the reasonable person's intelligence.  Biden is a Sick Joke.  Biden had two brain surgeries in 1988, and he never did have much intelligence, anyway.  There's more about Arrogant Joe Biden to convey, but that is beyond the scope of this discourse.

Below, posted pursuant to the Fair Use Act:  Compared to a 2012 posting by E. Jean Carroll, the opposite was stated in a 2023 federal NYC courtroom, where millions of American dollars were at stake.  Again, we have a credibility destroyer.  All in all, if you're going to condemn somebody, you better condemn him for the right reasons.


         End of Independent article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How can you have a case without a day and a year --- or a much more narrowed time span than three vague years --- stated as having been the time when an offense was alleged to have occurred? The accuser never stated a day or even the year when this sexual assault was supposed to have happened. This, of course, is another red flag, being that Donald Trump travelled a lot in the 1990s.  

Very simply, if this accuser stated a specific date of offense, then perhaps it would have been a day when Trump was nowhere near NYC.  Plus, the other red flag comprised the "Donna Karan Blazer Dress" that Carroll claimed to have been wearing when she was allegedly sexually assaulted.  It most certainly was not made or sold in 1994.  So, if Carroll "averred" on court documents to have been assaulted in 1994, the case would have been dismissed and she would have become subject to a defamation lawsuit, under the title, "vexatious litigation."  Stating a general season or a three-month period would have sufficed.

  The vagueness of time was enough to invalidate the case from the start.  After all, there was no evidence to prove that Donald Trump even brushed shoulders with E Jean Carroll outside of one "reception line moment" in the 1980s which was always a dime-a-dozen event for someone as famous as Donald Trump.  No police report was filed in '94, '95, or '96, either.   No medical record describing a sexual assault in '94, '95, or '96 was ever produced in any capacity or variety, as well.

Plus, the accuser made no contact with any woman's help-group or organization that helps women when physically harmed.  There was simply a very crass, uncouth, and disrespectful pro-abortion advice columnist claiming to have been sexually assaulted by the most famous pro-life political candidate on Planet Earth, and claiming that this occurred approximately a quarter of a century prior.  Can a journalist be quiet about something for 25 years of time?  It was ever-so-coincidental that the accusation came out when it was time to promote her 2019 book.  This woman's life is so full of coincidences.  In the alternate, this woman is so full of ...

Let's review:  The Year 2023 minus 1996 or 1995 or even 1994 = 27 or 28 or 29 years.  The Year 2019 ... when the accusation ended up on the news stands ... was 23 or 24 or 25 years after 1996 or 1995 or even 1994.

The other contradiction is that this E Jean Carroll claimed to have been raped IN New York City, but she had no fear of living in New York City.  Only in her remote cottage does she have fear to the point of sleeping with a gun.  Well, why doesn't she move out of her cottage and live in NYC?

I personally knew two rape victims.  E Jean Carroll did NOT act like either one of them when speaking of being "assaulted."  They did NOT have the mentality of "forgetting about it and just moving on with life."  I can go into detail later.  But, having personally known rape victims enabled me to instantly tell that E Jean Carroll is an insult to my intelligence.  

Plus, I personally know what it is to be the victim of an "attempted sexual aggression" done by a very pushy male body builder who LITERALLY couldn't keep "it" in his pants in a car.  I can go into detail about this later, in another post . . . unless I don't want to spend time on this.  HOWEVER, this enabled me to easily detect certain false accusers, as well as certain "credible accusers."  For now, know that the "insult" gets inflamed when a false accuser gets center stage on TV --- without a defense made for the accused.

Even when it came to her praising the Apprentice in 2012, she claimed that she did so, because she ALLEGEDLY had two friends who were on the Apprentice, and she wanted them to do well.  That, too, was a mighty coincidence.  After all, how many people even have one friend who was on the Apprentice?  Plus,  the audience size did NOT determine if a contestant would do well or not.  All was dependent upon the judgment of Donald Trump, as in the famous quote ===>  "You're fired." 

Or was she referring to two friends and/or acquaintances who were on the staff and/or cast of the show?  Well, if Carroll were promoting the Trump hit show for the sake of her two friends doing well on it, then she didn't do a very good job at it.  Moreover, if she were raped by Trump, then she would have told her two friends in the present tense that they shouldn't be on that show.  After all, a successful show empowered Trump.  A woman does not want her rapist to be empowered.

On a personal basis, if that male body-building weightlifter who tried to have his way with me had a TV show, there is no way in which I would be praising it or encouraging anyone to appear on it.  E Jean Carroll spit in the face of everyone in America who actually was targeted for sexual assault.  And remember, that particular guy who tried to have his way with me literally literally literally couldn't keep "it" in his pants.  (I'm trying to be polite in describing this.)

Now, I am not narrating the details of having been the target of very physical sexual aggression ... and I'm not line-itemizing the mindset of the actual rape victims I knew ... because any liar & con artist can memorize what I would state and then come off as credible in a con game.  Very simply, perhaps sometime in the future someone somewhere will consult with me and ask if Ms. So-and-So seems to be lying or telling the truth about her accusation against somebody somewhere.  Then I can  go into detail.

I can definitely go into detail about the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh, line item by line item.

And remember, I'm a registered democrat who used to wear his hair down to his shoulders.  So, you can take your "right-wing MAGA-hat-wearing Trumper" sticker and stick it somewhere else.  I'm also a member of Democrats for Life.  In fact, Donald Trump used to be a Democrat.  In as much, tagging someone as a right-wing deplorable Trumper insurrectionist is like forcing the Jews of Germany to wear yellow Star-of-David patches/badges.  Tagging people educated in atmospheric science as "deniers" is another defamatory sticker that immature pseudo-intellectuals put on people's faces.  

The Ballad of Jessica Leeds

Now, concerning the Jessica Leeds accusation, it was made known in 2016.  It resulted in a British gentleman coming forth, claiming that he was on that particular flight and remembered seeing Leeds basically grovel over Donald Trump.  In fact, the TV interviewer tested the British man's honesty and asked what Leeds was wearing that day.  The British gent quickly & confidentially said "She was wearing a white pants suit."  Therefore, you can rightfully say that the Jessica Leeds accusation was made-up in 2016; an election year.

Also concerning Jessica Leeds, a passenger jet is a public forum.  This means that a number of people were readily able to see Trump and/or Leeds.  Would a celebrity actually grope a woman in public?  Donald Trump was able to get a percentage of America's "available women" very easily and willingly into a posh & private apartment ... or hotel room ... bungalow ... etc..  He didn't need to do something as desperate as grope a woman in public.  

This accusation is an intense insult to the American intelligence.  Yet, CNN & MSNBC rode this horse as if the groping absolutely occurred.  A man who lives in palatial settings doesn't act like human trash in public.  Such a person does worry about his public image.   And Trump very easily could have gotten a woman into his private property.  He was in demand amongst certain lust-ridden women.

You must admit that women have been known to lie.  They have been caught lying, time and time again.  The Southern District of New York Federal Courthouse was turned into a Kangaroo Court.  Kaplan should be titled, Captain Kangaroo Court, and summoned to a judicial review board and then  ... bye-bye to one of the Southern NY gavels.
--------------------------------

E Jean Carroll also accused CBS's former head as having sexually assaulted her in an elevator which has no guarantee of privacy.  Anyone in the building could have pressed an elevator button from any floor and ended up catching Moonves in the act.  This allegation is exceptionally difficult to believe, especially when the other accusers of Moonves are very easy to believe.  It seemingly & ALLEGEDLY appears that Carroll was ALLEGEDLY jumping on the proverbial gravy train, to accuse someone already accused.  It definitely makes you sound more credible when you accuse someone already accused . . . until you tell a story that's logistically & ALLEGEDLY asinine.

Now, the other accusers of Moonves are easy to believe, because there are no dramatic theatrics in their story lines.  And none of the accusers claimed to have been raped.  They claimed to have been in unwelcomed & awkward situations --- even in stressful situations --- even in "close-calls." 

Concerning credible accusers, Tara Reade is most definitely credible.  She's Five Star Credible.  As a reminder, a credible accuser is one who does not contradict himself/herself as did E Jean Carroll more than once, followed by her allegedly covering-up the contradictions by adding allegedly bull-crap lines, bull-crap reasons, and bull-crap excuses.

Was she really motivated by Weinstein?

The news of Harvey Weinstein came out in 2017.  So, Jean Carroll claimed that the news of Weinstein motivated her into writing her book which contained accounts of the five most nightmarish men she encountered.  One of the five, according to her was the Donald Trump who said that he didn't know her beyond a few moments of niceties, in a reception line once.  Uhm, excuse me, but Weinstein was intruding upon women and paying undisclosed settlements for decades.  Weinstein was an open secret.

Jean Carroll was some type of journalist for the American edition of Elle Magazine, and Elle publishes in 45 countries.  It also has a syndication dept which allows local content to be published internationally.  Any journalist working in the realm of Hearst Publishing & Lagardere Global would have the deepest newest from the central places of the modern media, including Hollywood news.  She would have learned about the real Harvey Weinstein decades ago, unless if she worked with under-achievers.  So, why did she wait until 2017 to begin writing a book that was said to have been motivated by Weinstein?

The suspicion as to the motivation of Carroll publicly accusing Trump in 2019 was that, on July 25 2019, it was concluded that the Mueller Special Counsel investigation failed to get anything on Trump.  That was Plan C.  Now, it was time for someone to go to Plan D, in order to eject Trump from his seat of power.  Why did Carroll remain silent about this while Trump was securing the Republican presidential nomination, 2016?  Why did she remain silent in the public forum for 23 years, only to come out when she could ever so coincidentally ruin the political career of the most highly positioned pro-life candidate in America?  Yes, the Mueller Team was drifting away into pointlessness.  But, the "squad" was emerging before TV cameras owned by obsessive pro-abortion media outlets.  She would be able to ride their "coattails."

If E Jean Carroll truly were sexually assaulted by Trump, she would have sounded the alarm, to warn "her fellow women" that a sexual predator was on the loose in NYC.  If he did assault her, then she did a disservice to the women of New York, by remaining silent about a danger to womanhood in NYC.  So, why did she remain silent for 23/24/25 years, if Donald Trump were such a danger to women everywhere?  Note:  2019 minus 1994/1995/1996 = 23/24/25 years.

The following video links could finish the train of thought here, and there are notable & "revealing" allegations concerning the Carroll case mentioned in the clips linked below that are NOT mentioned here.  After all, there is the matter of Carroll's claim of wearing a Donna Karan Blazer Dress at the time of assault which could have been 1994, 1995, 1996, or never:




Her own words: E Jean Carroll's motive for going after Trump  (It had to do Trump's Pro-Life stance.)

Of course, lie after lie after lie after lie has been pushed by the mainstream commercial media.  This included the [1] Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Hoax, [2] the incitement of violence toward the young Nick Sandman, [3] the Duke Lacrosse team accusations proven false by something as simple as an ATM camera, and [4] Jussie Smollett's harrowing tale of a MINUS 7 degree FAHRENHEIT Chicago night that is intolerable weather for any MAGA-hat-wearing Southerner not used to such cold weather.

There was even the young native American lad wearing a replica of his ancestors' headdress, during a recent Kansas City Chief game.  Oh, he was a white, racist demon from Hell, according to the media.  Etc go the examples of lie after lie after lie told by the modern media.  

And then there was the Michael Brown horror story which resulted in lots of violence before the harrowing tale was found to have been a malicious falsehood, according to forensic evidence.






Like Nazi Dictators ... like the ruthless tyrants of old ... CNN & MSNBC would NOT allow counterpoint . . . open discussion ... written responses ... or live defense of defamatory accusations.

CNN, MSNBC and those similar are the real threats to "freedom."  They refuse to adhere to the intended American Way which is often called "democracy."  Well, for the record, the Intended American Way was that of a bicameral federal Republic, based on representatives and two houses of Parliament.   Democracy only works in small population jurisdictions.

In addition, the USA resembles a Constitutional Monarchy far more than any European government does, simply because the American president has access to several executive order options than Europe.  After all, Europe's elected heads of state often are designed to operate "at the pleasure of the parliaments."  The president is a viable third sector of government.  

Plus, throughout the decades, the media focused-in on the president as if the president were king.  Well, American presidents operate as checked & balanced constitutional monarchs, in their executive ordering and in their power to veto.

The actual greatness of American law, aside of the judicial doctrine of Stare Decisis (precedents & case law authorities in the courtroom), is the concept of amending courtroom pleas, witness accounts, and statistical reports.  This includes the concept of amending the constitution.  Thus, there is flexibility.  On the contrary, there is no flexibility with CNN, MSNBC, and others who will not be mentioned here.  The ones who condemned political opponents of being Nazi dictators are the actual Nazi tyrants.  These are the liars who call incendiary riots "mostly peaceful."  Well, if you are sick & twisted enough, you could call mass murderers mostly peaceful people, and do so with a straight face.  It is also insult the intelligence of anyone reasonable & rational listener.

How much longer will America's intelligence be insulted by the mainstream corporate media?   How much longer will Americans have to endure the Mainstream Media Dictatorship of the United States?  And how much longer will me being a registered Democrat continue to be one of the more worthless wastes of time?   If anyone is the Nazi politician, it's the Joe Biden who sought to have freedom of speech deleted from the internet.  The American tyrants are the ones who accuse everyone else of being the tyrant.

Is being a Republican much better?  Or is it preferrable to be a Natural Party member or a Green Partier or a Whig or a Tory or a Klingon or a member of Fred Flintstone's Loyal Order of Water Buffaloes or whatever else you can print on a voter's registration card?  

But of course, it's not the political party that matters.  It's the character of the candidate that does.  After all, there do exist pro-life democrats.  They're mostly skilled laborers who live in or work in a major city.  Some are college-aged youth.  Some are even Black democrats whose DNA comes from south of the Sahara.  They simply believe in the livable wage.   And they believe in making city life livable for children. 

To a pro-life democrat, abortion is a cop-out ... unless if the mother's life is in danger.  When the mother's life is in danger, then abortion is self-defense.  Moreover, pro-life democrats know that you can always let your child be put-up for adoption with zero objections.  And of course, the democrat way was and maybe still is that a child put up for adoption will be cared-for as any other child. 

They also believe that life should be the choice for the disabled & dying, as opposed to euthanasia.  After all, we are all gonna die.  So, why speed things up?   

None the less, pro-life democrats also understand why the modern mainstream media and obsessive left-wingers of the Democrat Party hate Trump.  They only hate him and seek to destroy Donald Trump, because he is a Pro-Life candidate.  If Trump were for abortion-on-demand, he would be regarded as America's loving uncle by the mainstream media and left-wing fanatics of the Democrat Party.  Abortion.  That's it.  That's the reason for hating Trump.

An obsessive pro-abortion hag's motive in seeking to destroy the most influential pro-life candidate in the United States has been in front of America's face, all along

Elizabeth Carroll's motive in attacking Donald Trump and Kavanaugh is posted below.  She wants baby-killing to continue to be done upon demand.  Now, this is an 80 year old human obsessed with keeping premeditated & medically assisted murder of other humans in operation.  Thus, if Donald Trump were a pro-abortion candidate, he would have never been accused of that which the pro-abortion E Jean Carroll accused him of having done.  

And of course, Trump had easy access to a number of hotels and office buildings near the department story where he was accused of being a sexual predator.  He also had easy access to champagne and other luxuries.  Rich men first seek to impress ... then seduce ... and to do so in comfortable and protected spaces, such as a apartment or hotel room, etc.   He didn't need a dressing room from where screams could easily be heard.

Plus, wherever Trump went, there was always a woman here and a woman there who were 'magnetized' toward him.  Thus, he was never so desperate that he would physically and instantaneously assail a woman in a public forum, thereby risking screams and the attention that screams bring.  All in all, the insulting of the American intelligence continues.  This becomes very easy to do when you 'dumb down' a nation's public school system for consecutive years at a time ... and then replace wisdom & logic with bullies.

The greatest irony is that Tara Reade had to escape the tyranny of the American president for the land regarded as the most evil land of them all by . . . the proponents of the American president.  

Of course, the present president is obsessively pro-abortion.  He apparently never heard of the caselaw authority of NUREMBERG, where people who get away with committing crimes against humanity for years think that they will never be held accountable.  Well, study history.  Everyone gets held accountability for long-term evils, eventually.  And when interviewed, they always say that they never thought that "it" would happen to them.  

In as much, Hell does exist and it's filled with people who never thought that they would go there.  The Number 1 indication that you're going to Hell when "your time is up" is that of you making life on earth a living Hell for others.  You get what you give.  This includes Hell and its chaos and its viciousness and Satanic grade of bullying.  Hell is a place where bullies end up getting bullied by much more powerful & hate-filled forces forever:

One more thing:  There is one ultimate reason why the "new" Democrat Party embraces homosexuality.  The power-yielders of the party see homosexuality as birth control.  That's it.  And it takes a democrat to know the secrets of his party.

All in all, it's the content of a politician's character which matters in elections, and Joe Biden is a cruel joke played upon my Democrat Party and America in general.  He is hateful & arrogant, as well as mathematically & logistically incompetent.  

When he speaks, he speaks as if he is picking a fight, instead of speaking to make the nation feel secure ... or at ease ... or hopeful.  He doesn't want you to understand anything.  He wants you to back-down.  Biden thinks that he's King Kong, but he only pounds on a caved-in chest.  

Hundreds of thousands of other adult Americans would make a far better president than Biden.  This includes Donald Trump .... Tulsi Gabbard ... K.T. McFarland ... Bryon Donalds ... Viv Ramaswamy ...  and probably you (if you're of age) ... or at least a few neighbors of yours ... or workmates of yours ... or relatives of yours ... or fellow club members of yours, whatever be your club of choice.  

Of course, RFK, Jr blew it.  Yet, he's mathematically not out of the running.  However, he blew it, anyway.  If you are clueless to what recently transpired in the Kennedy Campaign, then refer to the following links:





Actually, millions of Americans would make a far better president than Joe Biden; especially the ones who protect him and wait on him and brief him.  Anyone in the Pentagon would be a better president.  Anyone in an American submarine crew.  Any pilot, be he/she military or civilian.  Any ship captain, be he military or civilian.   Anyone in logistics ... in engineering ... in the construction trades ... in forestry ... in library science ... in accounting ... in Classical & Baroque music ... in literature ... in a school's foreign language department ...  in philosophy ... in psychiatry ... in architecture, etc, etc, etc, etc.  

Biden is the second worst choice you can possibly make.  The worse choice would be all those who promote Biden.  This is because they only want to USE BIDEN for their selfish goals.  Biden is meant to be their puppet ... their figure head ... their front.  The only person who would want Biden to be president is the one who wants to make all the decisions of a president behind the scenes.

Brain Surgery Biden

BTW, do Americans know that Joe Biden had TWO BRAIN SURGERIES in 1988, after a stroke?  Do Americans know that Biden graduated near the bottom of his law school class, long before his stroke?   Do Americans even know that Biden lied so embarrassingly in front TV cameras in 1988 that he had to withdraw from the presidential race?  Michael Dukakis ended up winning the Democratic presidential nomination.

The mainstream commercial media has lied about a number of topics, in addition to the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Hoax.   There is a list.  But, that list is beyond the scope of this post, being that academic homework is required to pinpoint & specify the dishonesty of the media in decades past.  And at present, time has to be dedicated to other projects.

For the record, the way "it" used to be --- concerning debates --- was that there was [1] the Point, followed by [2] the Counterpoint, with [3] a response to the Counterpoint, and [4] a response the counterpoint response.  This was done out of fairness, so that both debaters had two opportunities to speak . . . or to write.  Today, there is only censorship, preceded by name-calling and bullying.  The concept of honesty and fairness were thrown out the door, when it came to the modern mainstream media.

Of course, when it comes to American politics, those who are in their late 70s and 80s today, while having been in power for consecutive decades, keep a greed-stricken clinch on political power.  They are the Me-Me-Me & Mine-All-Mine generation.  This means that these United States have been an oligarchical dictatorship where you and I don't count.  We are the "Little People,"  even though we're the ones who have done what it took to keep people alive and society civilized.  The roads, crops, utility lines, appliances, warehouses, medical equipment, repair shops, and utilities don't build themselves.  We are the ones who built and/or maintained and/or renovated it all.  But of course, we don't count.  We are slaves to these oligarch's egos and lust.  This includes the lust for money.

The Real Dirty Dozen & the American Dictator for Life Phenomenon

In light of this, why did [1] the 83 year old Nancy Pelosi, [2] the 83 year old Jim Clyburn, [3] the 81 year old Joe Biden, [4] the 90 year old late Dianne Feinstein, [5] the 85 year old Maxine Waters, [6] Maryland's 84 year old Steny Hoyer, [7] New Jersey's 86 year old Bill Pascrell, [8] the 82 year old Bernie Sanders, [9] the 80 year old John Kerry, [10] the 76 year old Benghazi Barbie, [11] the 77 year old Donald Trump who has been in public life for 43 years, as well as [12] the Chuck Schumer who has been in the US Congress for 42 years ... refrain from passing the baton to a younger generation???  Cannot anyone else get a chance?   Does power and influence have to stay in the hands of a small cadre  of politicians who live quite comfortably and who are starting to look like Halloween movie characters?  

BTW, E Jean Carroll is 80 years old.  This brings us to a question:  What is the authoritarian tyrant factor possessing those in that age-group --- concerning people born between 1933 and 1948?

Stated for the record, a 72 year old, a 75 year old, and a 78 year old with no appreciable mental encumbrances entering into political office for the first time is morally acceptable, being that the individual had not yet been heard.  Such an individual did not spend the past 20, 30, and 40 consecutive years attending lobster dinners, all the while destroying American opportunities, increasing the American Trade Balance Deficit, and raising the national debt to an obscenely high amount, as well as creating division amongst the races, and making America an accomplice in crimes against humanity, such as sweatshop labor profiteering.  

In as much, the 6TH NUREMBERG CRIMINAL COUNT was slave labor.  To profit from slave labor is to be an equal to Adolph Hitler and his merry band of Nazi art thieves.  Donald Trump spoke against the foreign sweatshop economy, as in the USMCA ... which is not to be confused with the Village People hit song, YMCA.  

Chuck Schumer praised Trump for it.  Therefore, the MSNBC & CNN line-up of on-air mouthpieces who endlessly mock Trump supporters are no different than Hitler's Nazi party members, spreading lies intended to create hatred toward a political opponent. They have been obsessively damning a man who was trying to lift people out of poverty.

The Political Oligarchs' Clinched Fists of Greed.

Why did today's politicians keep "it" for themselves, with "it" being defined as money & power, influence & perks ... as well as a long ego trip.  These very-long-term congressional members should be declared Dictators for Life.   After all, these were the people who oversaw the annihilation of American manufacturing and the rise of the American importation of Chinese slave labor products.  So, (except for Schumer, in his proper anti-NAFTA stance) they are accomplices to the labor abuse in the China, Nepal, Vietnam, Indonesia, Honduras, El Salvador, and other victimized countries when the Slavery Index went on the rise.  But, those politicians go unaccountable for having destroyed the American Dream.

Throughout the slave labor years, Joe Biden was there, letting it occur in a China which ever-so-coincidentally sent checks to the Biden families members' LLCs.  That, of course, was a mighty coincidence, for sure.   Quite frankly, that was and is more of an insult to America's intelligence.

Democrat Chuck Schumer Praised Donald Trump in 2018

Ironically, Chuck Schumer is portrayed as harboring quintessential anti-Trumpness.  Yet, in 2018, he praised Trump for the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, while always having been against Slave Labor NAFTA.  He and Trump were on the same page, when it came to the American worker ... and foreign labor abuse.   But, the media had to make them look like mortal enemies, of course.  Media Hype in search of ratings.

None the less, the Never Trump Movement ever-so-coincidentally came at the same time span when the E Jean Carroll accusation against Trump went into print.  Yes, the 2018 election was the Never Trump Movement's introduction into politics.  The squad of extreme pseudo-intellectuals formed during the first half of 2019.  Other Never-Trumpers entered congressional chambers in the first half of 2019, as well.  Then, on July 21, 2019, E Jean Carroll's accusations against Trump came out in the New Yorker.  Yet, she never reported any sexual assault to the police.  After all, the New Yorker influences voters.  Police departments do not.   So, the question which persists is, "How long does the media intend on insulting America's intelligence?"

Moreover, how is it that US congressional members are such successful investors in the stock markets of Wall Street?  That's an amazing coincidence.  

In 1787, Ben Franklin announced that America now had a republic, IF AND ONLY IF Americans could keep it.  In as much, do you mean to tell us that the stronghold held by the 40-year-plus congressional dictators-for-life is why we overthrew monarchs?  Do you really think that it was done to replace monarchs with money-grabbing senior citizens like Pelosi & Biden who have been sucking-in the money & political power like vacuum cleaners for consecutive decades?  Do you mean to tell us that the monarchs were overthrown, so that the United States could be strangled with a $34 TRILLION debt, accrued by the 70+ & 80+ plus year old members of Congress who will leave that burden upon younger generations of today & younger generations yet to come ... and to do so with no sense of shame?

For the record, the debt was only $34 BILLION in 1936.  In fact, it was $33 TRILLION 3 months prior to January 2024.  Yes, a trillion dollars of debt was accrued in 3 months' time, during the Biden rule of law which, in reality, is the Biden Absence of Law.

There is at least a tiny amount of fairness involved today, concerning the retail sales of foreign imports, such as coffee and cacao/cocoa.  After all, Nasreen Sheikh has been championing the cause of sweatshop laborers.  Therefore, even during times of great evil, there is always hope within humanity.  Thus, the belief that we are near the End of the World . . . or near the End of Mankind ... is political propaganda stunt, done for votes from terrified voters.  Well, I can assure you that the end of your world ... and the end of my world ... will come a whole lot sooner than the End of THE World.  There is most definitely still hope today.

Friday

What It Means to be Baptized a Priest, Prophet, & King


For those unfamiliar with the rite of baptism, after a person is baptized in the Catholic
Church, the baptizing priest tells the person, in the presence of the person's sponsor,
that he/she is baptized a priest, prophet, and king.  The meaning of the title goes as
follows:

Priest

Firstly, what does a priest generally do?  ANS:  A priest offers sacrifices to God.  In                       as much, to be "baptized a priest" means that you have the power to offer prayers &                   sacrifices for the conversion of sinners and to obtain results in the process.  This is a             baptized layman's (laywoman's) most important power, because Christ came "to save                 his people from their sins.,"  When you partake in Christ's highest mission, it makes                      you the most Christlike amongst all of humanity. 

Prophet

To be baptized a prophet means that you know the mind of God and the eventual
consequence of living contrary to God's mind.  At baptism, the Holy Spirit bestows               Infused Knowledge to the baptized individual.  This translates into Catholic Instinct.

Now, the Mind of God, the Way of God, the Will of God, and the Law of God are
the exact same thing.  In being baptized, you instinctively know the way God is.                        Prophets are social consciences.  In being baptized a prophet, you literally receive                       an instinctive conscience.  You instinctively  know the intimate details of God's                        personality, including God's likes and dislikes.  God's dislikes are known as sins. 

King

Very simply, baptism makes you an heir to the Kingdom of God.  In more detail ...

To be baptized a king means that you were christened as was King David and that
the christening enables you to share in the Divinity of Christ.  This means that you
have the power to unite your works with Christ and make them infinite.   This was
indicated at Fatima, in a prayer that the Angel of Peace taught the Fatima children,
in 1916.



As a qualifying note, in order to have the power to absolve penitents from sin, one
needs the sacrament of Holy Orders.  Firstly, it is an absolute lie to claim that you
confess your sins in private and that God forgives you, as if you exist in a vacuum,
far far away from other human beings.  Secondly, it's important to note that the priest-
hood powers of Holy Orders and the priesthood function that comes with baptism are
entirely distinct.  A layman can obtain a person's conversion, by obtaining the grace
of conversion for that person.  But, only the ordained priest has the power to absolve                that person from his/her sins.

No matter how evil the priest is, he has the same power to absolve you of your sins                     as does any other priest.  His problem is that he cannot absolve himself of his sins. 

As an additional qualifying statement, if a person is near death, yet no priest is near-
by, the solution from God is that of giving the dying person the grace to commit either
a Perfect Act of Contrition or a Perfect Act of Love.  If the person is not yet baptized,
then there is the possibility of the person receiving the grace to perform a baptism of
desire.  If the person never heard of Christ and his church, the person is assessed by
the precepts of natural law.  Contrary to the White Anglo Saxon Protestant mindset
of 19th Century America, in the Kingdom of God, ignorance IS an excuse of the law.
If you never heard of the Messiah, you are not bound to believe in someone you nev-
er knew existed.  However, when you die, he will be presented to you, and that is
when you make your eternal decision.

Color ... and grace ... are more noticeable when surrounded by darkness.

Now, it is a 100% lie to say that you chose "Jesus as your Lord and personal savior."
In the scriptures, Jesus is quoted as having said, "You did not chose me. Rather, I
chose you
."  You can chose nothing and no one without the grace to do so.  Christ
choose to give grace.  You have zero power to take it from him.  In fact, the most
psychotically distrustful conspiracy theorists I have ever had the aggravation of
encountering all have one arrogant belief.  It's the belief that "Christ conscious-
ness" is within us all, and all we have to do is extract it.  These are the ones who
refer to a saint as a "highly evolved person."  This is merely self-worship, in pro-
claiming that you're God with all the consciousness of divinity within you.

Each one of those persons had a few things in common.  1}  They were never in
the "popular school clicks,"  2} they were too uncoordinated to excel at sports
and even became envious at those who did.  3} They were emotionally cold and
even nerdlike.  They were too proud to confess their sins to a priest, claiming to
be the new priests themselves ... the new cosmic conscious of the era.  Again, they                     are cases of self-worship, and they were seething with envy.  Concerning sin ...

Let's go one step further:  If a person isn't sorry for his sins, but wills to cease
committing his mortal sins, the absolution given to him after confessing his sins
is valid.  This is called attrition.  Thus, there is contrition (sorrow for sin) and
there is attrition (admitting guilt and resolving to amend your ways without be-
ing contrite.)  Attrition and a good confession results in the forgiveness of sins.

Perfect Contrition and the will to go to confession in the future, if the opportunity
ever presents itself, results in the forgiveness of sins, also.  If you are near death
and are certain to never see a priest, the act of perfect contrition results in you be-
ing absolved of your sins.  The act of perfect love does, also.  Dying the death of
true martyrdom is an act of perfect love.

True martyrdom requires you to die unarmed.   Dying while killing someone is not
martyrdom.   It might be just warfare and an act of war heroism.  It might even be
justified self-defense.  But, it's not martyrdom.  Furthermore, blowing yourself up,
along with many unarmed people on a bus, is never martyrdom.  It's murder and
you will go to Hell for all eternity immediately after having wasted your life and
the lives of others, as a suicide bomber.   

Conversion only comes through actual grace

As was previously mentioned, an important feature of the priest, prophet, and king
state is the power to obtain the conversion of sinners.   Fatima affirmed how this
worked.  No one is converted in a vacuum.  Nobody is converted by persuasive talk.
A person is only converted by actual graces being bestowed upon the person in need
of conversion.  A grace is an impulse upon the soul ... like anointing droplets of oil.

Grace will not come to any person without someone already baptized praying or sa-
crificing for the person in need of conversion.  This is the case, no matter how many
TV evangelism shows the person watches.  This is the case, no matter how many
pages of the Bible are read to the person.  At Fatima, Our Lady said, "Poor sinners 
go to Hell because they have no one to pray for them or make sacrifices for them."

This is the most important aspect of the Fatima apparitions, because Hell is forever.
After all, you take with you into eternity take the love or anti-love within you.  Now,                    people have repeatedly witnessed Hell on Earth.  If there is Hell on Earth, there                      most certainly is Hell in Eternity --- outside of time & space.

If you don't pray for conversions, people won't be converted.   In having been bap-
tized a priest, you have the power to obtain the conversion of others even if you are
in a state of mortal sin.   Sin doesn't take away your power to offer prayers and sa-
crifices for others, being that sin doesn't take away your baptism.  When a person
commits mortal sin, the individual doesn't have to be baptized again.  In as much,
the Anabaptist movement was an error.  A person can only be baptized once.  Any
further attempts at baptism it is an illusion.  Anabaptists of old where called South-
ern Baptists.

If you don't know if you have ever been baptized, the officiating priest will perform
a Conditional Baptism upon you, just to make sure.  If you are near death, and no
priest is available, a baptized layman becomes the one assigned to baptize you.  The
laity does have the power to baptize.  Using that power becomes lawful when death
is near and no priest is available.  If no Christian is present to baptize you, your de-
sire to be baptized is baptism in itself.  Such is the Baptism of Desire.

There is also Baptism by Blood.  This is the case when you die for the faith before
receiving the opportunity to be baptized by water.  There is only one door to mercy.
But, there is more than one key to open the door.

Now, in order to gain spiritual indulgences for the souls in Purgatory, you need to
be in the state of sanctifying grace.   None the less, you need not worry if whether
or not you are in the state of grace when praying for the conversion of poor sinners
who will otherwise be in Hell for all eternity without your assistance.

If you are devoted to the Mercy of God, and if you are obtaining the conversion of
sinners while in the state of mortal sin, know that, one day, the sacrifices or prayers
of another person will obtain your conversion.

The Eternal God will open the doors of mercy to each person who displayed some
type of mercy in this life.  God never grants any mercy to the merciless. Let it be
repeated:  God never grants mercy to the merciless.

Of course, praying for the conversion of sinners is an act of mercy each time you
do so.  St. Francis de Sales, former Bishop of Geneva Switzerland, wrote that pray-
ing for the souls in Purgatory is actually the act of performing all of the works of
mercy at once.  Do not be deceived.  Purgatory exists.  Denying its existence illu-
strates that you are a lazy person who refuses to ease suffering.  It also makes you
a coward in your perpetual denial.  If you deny the existence of Purgatory, it simply
means that you are afraid of it... that you don't want it to exist.

The caveat is that, sometimes the grace of conversion given to the mercy worker
comes in the form of a fiery awakening, attached to an intense reality check of suf-
fering.  This was the case with King David.  Yet, it was for King David's own good.
After all, Christ stated in the Book of the Apocalypse and to Saint Teresa of Avila,
"I chastise the ones I love."  Thus, if you have done much evil and never were pun-
ished for it, it is a sign that you are destined to Hell for all eternity.

Christ appeared a number of times to a German prioress named, Gertrude.  So too
did Our Lady.  Once, Gertrude saw a vision of Mary where she suddenly opened
her mantel (her long cloak), and near Mary's feet were an array of animals whom
Mary would occasionally pet.  Gertrude asked who the animals were.  Mary said
that they were the sinners who will one day convert.  She said that she kept them
protected, so that their conversion would one day be assured.  So, if you're the
greatest sinner on Earth, always feel welcomed to pick up a rosary, a chaplet,
the Psalms, or a prayer book, and start praying.  Walk the Stations of the Cross.
Meditate on the meaning of various religious images.  Pray what the Angel of
Peace taught the Fatima children in 1916.  If you ask for the conversion of sin-
ners, one of those conversions will be your own.

If you state that your sins are too great for God to forgive, it means that you're an
arrogant person who claims that your actions are greater than God's actions.  You
are claiming that your sinfulness is greater than God's mercy.  If you are the most
evil human of all time, God's mercy is still available to you.  

In addition, your power to offer acceptable sacrifices is not limited to the conver-
sion of sinners.   You can make offerings for healings, external graces, internal
graces, the end of war, the end of drought, the end of pestilence, to get a spouse,
transportation, a house, employment, vocations, freedom from debt, freedom from
tyrants, and freedom from all types of misfortune.  All begins with your power to
offer supplications to the Divine Sovereign, aka the Lord.   If you're baptized, you
have a power you shouldn't waste.  If you're not baptized, you can be.  Christ estab-
lished a church with open doorways.
___________________________________________________________________

Wednesday

Envy is why a 1/3 of the angels rebelled and targeted humanity for eternal destruction.



Author's Preliminary Note:   The prime
reference of the following text is a teach-
ing of the early church martyr, St Ignatius
of Antioch.  A concurrence of this text
comes from 18th Century Dominican
priest, St. Louis of Montfort.  It was
St. Ignatius, in the Year 100, who
coined the title, Catholic Church.


The title commonly used to define the only church that Jesus Christ ever
founded is not a Medieval invention.  The title traces itself to the original
apostles, their immediate successors, and the early church fathers.  As far
as concerns Louis of Montfort, he accentuated the phenomenon where the
Archangel Gabriel was actually making reparation for the Sin of Satan, on
behalf of all the angels, by saluting Mary the way in which Gabriel saluted
her.

The First Creation

Before time began, it was resolved in the mind of God that there would be be-
ings created with intellect and free will.  There would be two general species
created, so that one species would compliment the other one.  It was simultan-
eously resolved that the created beings would possess everlasting existence.
Now, before the creation of time, space, and physical matter, there was the
creation of beings of pure spirit.  This was the first species created in the
image and likeness of God.

These were beautifully created people with extreme agility and talent.  None
the less, a problem was presented by these creatures' existence.  They were
made to exist forever, but each one had to show commitment to the creator,
in order for each one to exist in a state of everlasting of life.  Within the
commitment would be expressions of gratitude and charity.  This was im-
portant, because the alternative for any spirit not transacting in gratitude
and charity was everlasting death. 

The Test

God would reveal to the newly created spirits God's Will, in order to see if
they consented in it, in order to see if they marveled in it, and in order to see
if they looked forward to its completion with anticipation.  Within the divine
will was the intention of God to become a member of God's own creation.
However, it was not a member of the newly created spirit community that
God willed to become.  Rather, God willed to become a member of the next
species to be made.  It was to be a species comprising material existence and
spirit.  It was humanity.

God was already pure spirit and had no desire to be redundant in becoming a
member of a species which was also pure spirit.  God was going to become
man.   In God's will to become man, there was the matter of providing for a
mother.   Being that God would need a mother, one specific woman, yet to
come, was chosen to be the mother of God.  This woman was the central fo-
cal point of God's will.

This woman was the spirits' test, in order to enable them to show fidelity to
God.  All spirits who would be overcome with a sense of delight and/or won-
der and/or compassion over the idea that God would become a member of a
new and foreign creation will have proven their commitment to, and therefore
charity toward, God.  They would have also shown their assent to honoring the
woman destined to be the mother of God.  They would then become instantan-
eously glorified and endowed with eternal life.

The War

Among the newly created spirits were some exceptionally gifted ones.  In fact,
some were created to burn with a white incandescent charity.   These were the
Seraphim.  Now, being exceptionally gifted has a danger to it.   The danger con-
sists in the fact that, the more that is given to you, the more that is expected from
you.

Among the spirits was an exceptionally gifted one of great beauty.   His name
was Light Bearer.   This can be translated into the name, Lucifer.   Lucifer re-
garded his species of creation as the most magnificent thing that anyone could
image.   In fact, Lucifer considered his species to be so magnificent that it would
only be right for God to want to become a member of it  ....  so thought Lucifer.

All that Lucifer had to do was be compassionately moved over the idea of a for-
eign species coming into existence which would include the woman destined to
be the mother of God.  Lucifer did nothing other than become envious over God
wanting to be made human instead of being made spirit all over again.  He simul-
taneously became filled with a seething hatred over the woman destined to come.

Lucifer resolved to rise to glory on his own power.   In sequence, he began a
rebellion within the spirit world, in the attempt to overthrow the Will of God.
However, within the spirit world was another spirit who also was exceptionally
gifted.  His conclusion was a rhetorical question by which he stated, "Who is
like the Lord?"   Translated into Hebrew, "Who is like the Lord" is mi cha el.
The mi cha el spirit made a stance to defend the Heaven which God had cre-
ated.   Other spirits joined him.   This resulted in the first and only World War
of the spirit world. 

The result of that war was that the army of the mi-cha-el spirit won.   In fact, the
result of the spirit war is summarized in the words of Jesus of Nazareth when he
said, "I saw Satan fall from Heaven like a bolt of lightning."


Lucifer, the magnificent creation who comprises pure spirit, had now became the
impure spirit.   A third of the spirit world did also.  In sequence, his lightning style
expulsion from Heaven resulted in of all the lights going out in him who was once
called Light Bearer.   He then became the Prince of Darkness.   The spirit capable
of doing great good had now become the Evil One.  He had now become the Devil. 

The Original Sin


Equal to the former beauty of the Prince of Darkness was his hatred for mankind ...
... even before mankind was created.   No sooner was mankind created than was
the Devil scheming to destroy it.   He started by targeting the first generation
woman whom God created as a gift to the first generation man.

The Devil, symbolically referred to as the ancient serpent, set off to target the
first generation woman.   His quest was to trick her into committing spiritual
suicide.   He figured that,  if he could get mankind to sin,  then God would dis-
own humanity and destroy it.   The Devil would then prevail in his hatred of
mankind, he thought.   This meant that he would never have to see the lady
chosen to one day come into existence and be the mother of God Incarnate.



Now, whatever the exact act was, know that the original sin is something that
can never be done again.   The sin could only be committed while in the pre-
ternatural state;  in the state of man before the original sin rendered him in the
state of vulnerability and mortality.   The eating of the forbidden fruit was sym-
bolic of partaking in something already produced through the knowledge of
good and evil.   The woman was deceived into thinking that she was being
given the path to everlasting life.   She was told that God was an envious liar
who was deliberately keeping her away from glory.

The man for whom the woman was created partook in her sin solely out of a
sense of peer pressure.   He wanted to please his mate.   In addition, mention
that they saw themselves naked, after having committed the original sin, was
symbolic that they had realized that they were stripped of grace.

When God intervened, after mankind's fall from grace, guarantee was made
that there would be an enmity between the offspring of the woman and the
diabolical serpentthat the offspring would crush his head when he would
strike for the offspring's heal.   The very act that the Evil One orchestrated,
in the hope of having mankind destroyed, assured that mankind would have
a savior.   It would now be guaranteed that the woman destined to be the
mother of God would come into existence.    The Devil couldn't thwart the
Will of God.

Take note on how the symbolic image of serpent accentuates the reality of
crushing the Evil One's head.   Thus, the intercepting of the serpent, when the
serpent lunged to inject deadly venom, is the operative image upon which to
reflect.   Holding down the serpent's head is symbolic of keeping evil at bay;
of keeping evil constrained.

The Ensuing State of Affairs

In all the spiritual world there is only one enmity;  one battle line.   It is between
the woman chosen to be the mother of God and the Devil.   To say that the great
enmity is between God and the Devil is to make the Devil an equal of God.   God
is infinite and incomparable.   The Devil is finite and he fools himself.   The apo-
calyptic enmity is between the Mother of God Incarnate and the Devil.   In fact,
she is also the Queen of Angels, meaning that she influences the actions and re-
solutions of those spirits who were created before she was.

The pertinence to this is that the Devil is the first person to commit blasphemy
against the woman destined to blossom with immaculate love for God.   Such a
thing is defamation.   In refusing to honor this woman, the Devil committed a sin
against God which required reparation.   That reparation would be made one day
by a spirit named Gabriel when he would say before the destined woman, "Hail, 
full of grace.   The Lord is with You.   You are the most blessed among all 
women."   The Archangel Gabriel is the Angel of Reparation.   The act of re-
paration made by Gabriel became the foundation stone of the New Testament.

Patrick Pontillo
_____________

Monday

The Sin of Cooperation: We all go to Hell, together

Hell is filled with people who never thought they'd go there.

Rhetorical Question:  How many people in Nazi Germany thought themselves to have
been good, wholesome, and upstanding citizens contributing to the good of the Father-
land, when the fact was that they were being nothing more than criminal accomplices,
bringing the wrath of the allies upon them so badly that Germany would be turned in-
to a facsimile of the heavily cratered moon? 

As of New Year's 2014, the Obama administration remained vehement in getting Cath-
olic employers to violate Humanae Vitae, and supply for their employees that which is
taught in the Catholic faith as a sin of murder.  Now, people see that Oprah was wrong 
when she said that Obama was "the one."  People also see that he's not the Antichrist.                         None the less,  Obama's vice president picked up the baton of death and had his ad-                           ministration run with it.  Running with that baton is like running with a lit stick of                            dynamite.  Their political party has been the party of death for decades.

Concerning this, the Republican TEA party economy makes it difficult to raise a child.
Thus, the people who act all-so-self-righteous do more to tempt people into abortion
and artificial contraception than anyone else in America.  The hypocrisy is deafening.

Despite its platform that supports sins against justice, the Republican Party is the par-
ty of choice for American Catholics, simply because of the Democratic abortion plat-
form.  Today's American Catholics of financial influence are too cowardly and lazy
to start a much needed new political party.  Both major parties in America support
mortal sins that we are expected to support with our cooperation.  So, Catholics in
American get to go to Hell with the political hypocrites who are nothing more than
leeches vying for campaign re-election money which will make them cow-tow to
their funders' whims.  Thus, one will support abortion and the other will support
anti-immigration legislation, medical pricing gouging, sweatshop profiteering,
sins against ecology, military bankruptcy spending, and anti-disability legisla-
tion, as well as anything that antagonizes the moral theology of Distributive
Justice, as well as Economic Justice.

The first thing that must stop is the sin of defraudment of  laborers of their wages,
in the form of sweatshop imports, due to the enormous Trade Balance Deficit that
it caused, resulting in 5 million lost jobs and 60,000 lost manufacturing operations
in the United States.  This issue is as current as the riots in Cambodia, where ex-
tremely underpaid garment workers rioted and where police shot at them, killing
a few in the process.




Also, American income disparity among Americans must end.  Some workers in
the U.S. are so underpaid that the federal government must provide food stamps,
in order for them to go to work to make a few extremely wealthy.


Providing artificial contraceptives doesn't procure any kind of justice.  It merely
encourages sins against the 6th Commandment.
______________________________________________________________
The Nine Ways in Which One Can Be an Accessory to the Sins of Others

     1. By counsel.               2. By command.              3. By consent.
     4. By provocation.        5. By praise or flattery.    6. By concealment.
     7. By partaking.            8. By silence.                  9. By defense of the ill done.
         ______________________________________________________________

      The Sin of Cooperation is synonymous with the Sin of Accessory.  It's equally
       synonymous with being an accomplice to the sins of another.  There are many
       accomplices in Hell.  These were the ones who empowered dictators, pillage-
       minded war lords, price gougers, good ole boy networks, sweatshop profiteers,
       robber barons, and those who sought to legalize sins as deadly as intentional
       abortion.  These were the Yes Men of Evil, empowering the manipulators who
       would have gotten absolutely nothing accomplished without the cooperation of
       many.

       Of course, many of the many were accomplices, because they were cowards,
       if not in love with the evils that the manipulators sought to have legalized, in-
       stitutionalize, and accommodated.  Even those who did the manipulating were
       cowards, in that they had to leech off of the acts of others, in order to prevail
       in evil. 

       Most accomplices are cowards who succumbed to peer pressure.  You don't
       have to be one of them.  In fact, if you happen to claim that your sins are far
       too great to be forgiven, the fact that you're not dead and Hell is evidence that
       you're presently being carried by the Mercy of God.  Thus, your sins aren't too
       great to be forgiven, per se.  God is enduring them as you read.  Only you have
       the power to turn your sins into the unforgivable state, simply by pushing away
       the Holy Spirit, the forgiver of Sins.

       All in all, you would already be in Hell if your sins were unforgivable.  You are
       still able to take advantage of this mercy and then to start having mercy on God.
       A person has mercy on God by ceasing his/her mortal sins, and even by making
       reparation for the sins of others.  This includes the Sin of Cooperation.

       The ceasing of mortal sin is a grace from God.  You're always welcomed to ask
       such a grace ... no matter what you have done .... and you may always pray to
       Jesus.  In fact, in the Law of Grace, the greater be the sinner, the greatest is that
       person's right to mercy.  Christ paid dearly for your dose of mercy, ahead of time.

    I} Part 3, Section 1, Chapter 1, Article 8 of the Official Catholic Catechism states. 
        But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law which
        are written in the conscience of every man. 

   II} Jesus was quoted in the Gospels as having said, "Those who deny me before
         men I will deny before my Father."  One can deny Christ by denying his
         commandments.

  III} As was mentioned in the Book of the Apocalypse, every damnation is a matter
         of being deceived by the Devil.  St. John exactly described the eternally damned
         as those who were deceived as such.  This deception consists in fanatics stripping
         away natural instinct from people, in an politically activist Orwellian way.

 IV} As was mentioned in the Book of James (4:17), one who knows the right thing
         to do, yet neglects to do it, sins.  Such as a thing is known as a Sin of Omission.
         It's also known as a Sin of Negligence.  In addition, Pius XII's edition of moral
         theology mentioned the existence of the Sin of Inconsiderateness. 

   V} As was stated in the Gospel of Luke (12:48), much will be required of the per-
         son entrusted with much.  Yet more will be demanded of the person entrusted
         with more.  Therefore, bishops are judged far more severely than the laity.

  VI} Vatican II expressly stated that the nature of the church on earth is militancy.
          In fact, the Baltimore Catechism and other catechisms identify the church on
         earth as the Church Militant.  This involves what St Paul referred to as fighting
         the good fight ... as is striving to have good prevail over evil.  To neglect this
         duty is to be immersed in sins of negligence, aka sins of omission.  To neglect
         this duty is to eventually be immersed in Hell, a place where one is disjointed
         for all eternity, while living the paradox of being one step behind eternity, in
         having no rhythm to his/her existence.

 VII} Pope Paul VI stated that, if you want peace you must work for justice.  This in-
         sight actually came from the Book of Isaiah, where Kindness begets Truth and
         fairness (justice) begets peace.  If you remain silent to injustice, cooperating with
         it all the while, you will have the same destiny as those who instigated and prolif-
         erated the injustices.  Such as were the cases with the citizens of Nazi Germany,
         Imperial Japan, and the racist Confederate South of the United States. 

     ========================================================


     The Children of Fatima saw a vision of Hell and were instantaneously terrified at it's
     sight.  St. Teresa of Avila saw a vision of Hell too, yet she said that it was her great-
     est gift, being that it served the function of a life-changing wake-up call.  Both Saint
     Teresa and the children of Fatima saw humans souls falling into Hell with the velocity
     of snowflakes.
                                               The Roll Call of Hell

There are numerous souls in Hell who found out too late that their fellow humans aren't
toys to abuse.  They simultaneously found out that God isn't a make-believe fairy tale.
The same souls found out that complying with the impulses of human conscience, as is
universally written in the human heart by the Eternal God, is not something optional.

The same eternally damned people learned far too late that morality is not a mere matter
of opinion, either.  To top off the Roll Call of the Eternally Damned are those who could
neither control their senses nor place their temperaments in check.

Fatima seer Jacinta Martos stated before her death, "Souls go to Hell for sins of the 
flesh more than any other reason."  In as much, according to St Benedict of Nursia,
the Father of Western Monasticism, the #1 goal in the True Catholic Way (and not the
impostor way) is that of conquering your cravings.  In as much, a person who occasion-
ally fasts on either water, herbal teas, vegetable broths, bread, or bland foods is a per-
son far more adaptable and far more giving than other people.  This is also a person
far more perceptive, wielding fortitude and self-control with much more prowess than
others.  Those who don't occasionally fast are numb in their perceptions and are easily
deceived.

       Mercy is only Bestowed upon those who Bestowed Mercy on Others

Shortly before WWII, Christ said to Blessed Faustina Kolwaska that a person must
perform one type of mercy or another in this life, in order to receive mercy from Christ
in the next one.  Thus, the merciless always go to Hell.

      The Sin of Presumption is so Prevalent that it Screeches throughout Hell

Within the Roll Call of Hell are also those who lived the lie that their future sins were al-
ready forgiven and that God was "going to let them slide", because preachers told them
that they were "saved."  This belief is known as the sin of presumption, as in presuming
that God's mercy already resulted in the remission of sin.  In fact, presumption is nothing
more than laziness.  The fact is the Christ came to save his people from their sins.  If you
continue to engage in habitual mortal sin, then you've been saved from nothing. 

               Complying with Peer Pressure:  Another Sure Way to Hell

As was previously stated, also in endless torment are those who succumbed to peer
pressure and became guilty of the sin of cowardice.  In their cowardice, they became
merciless to someone whom they could have helped in life, but refused to assist, due to
their succumbing to peer pressure   These people usually say, "I was only following 
orders."   We proceed
________________________________________________________________

Mortal Sin:  It's Spiritual Suicide.  A Sinner:  It's a person who loves evil and then
transforms into the evil loved.  Those deepest in Hell are those most successful at hav-
ing gotten other people to cooperate with their sins.  Such a thing is always an element
of tyranny.  Tyranny is always lawlessness.

The sin of cooperation involves the phenomenon of Social Scandal, otherwise known as
Corporate Sin.  Now, corporate sin does not limit itself to cooperating with the sins of
corporate executives.  Corporate means body, and a corporate sin is any sin that ends
up being permeated throughout all of a body politic.  It's one that is legalized, institution-
alized, and accommodated in society.  The Chattel Slavery of the American Confederate
South is an example of a social sin, as is the mass murder of  Gypsies, Jews, the mentally
impaired, the physically disabled, and dissident journalists under Nazi German rule.

Other examples include Oliver Cromwell's persecution of Irish Catholics, the apartheid
of South Africa, Japan's rape of Nanking, Mao's persecution of the Tibetan culture, and
of course, the labor camp system of modern China that resulted in workers committing
suicide, threatening suicide, etc.  Add to this the legalized form of adultery known as di-
vorce and remarriage, other forms of sexual anarchy, elective abortion, the desecration
of Sunday in heavily christened populations, other forms of sins against ecology, and the
various types of price gouging.

To cooperate with a corporate sin is to accommodate and institutionalize a sin as if it
were a civil right.  To cooperate with social scandal is to act as if accommodating it is
a duty to God.  Such cooperation occurs in the workplace, as one's job description. 

The Sin of Cooperation, as it Applies to the Message of Fatima

The Sin of Cooperation was the essence of the Fatima message, in as far as concerned
a statement Sr. Lucia was once quoted as having allegedly said.  This quote came years
before Bertone and Sodano took seats of power at the Vatican and decided to revise
the entire Fatima message to their convenience.  Therefore, the pre-Sodano quote has
an element of reliability and credibility attached to it.  Sr. Lucia Martos was once quot-
ed as having said, "We'll either be damned together or we'll be saved together."
In as much, being damned together consists in being an accomplice to each other's sins.

The Sin of Cowardice

In order to understand how the sin of cooperation operates in the human mind, consider
the following rhetorical question:  How many citizens of the Nazi regime regarded them-
selves as good, wholesome, and upstanding citizens faithfully upholding the Fatherland,
when in reality, they were provoking the destruction that was soon to be hurled upon the
sum total of Germany, by the allied forces and the underground saboteurs?

As was previously mentioned, you need to understand that all occasions of damnation
consist in being deceived by the Devil.  In the Book of the Apocalypse, St. John refers
to the Eternally Damned in this way.  In as much, consider how many violent practices
occurred under the guise of being the new enlightenment ... a new dawning ... the new
Springtime.  For example, Christians died as a result of the Arabian Spring of 2011.  In
Nazi Germany, Crystal Night was a collective crime.  Yet, it was seen as the cleansing
of Germany.  It was the opposite thereof.

The same Book of Revelations (the Apocalypse) mentions that cowardice is a sin,
at its 21st Chapter:  Now, as for cowards, the unfaithful, the depraved, murder-
ers, the unchaste, sorcerers, idol-worshipers, and deceivers of every sort, their
lot is in the burning pool of fire and sulfur, which is the second death. (verse 8
Incidentally, being frightened to death doesn't make you a coward.  Running away
when you are needed does.  In fact, as is seen in certain pampered political opera-
tives, cowards can be bullies ... until they are put to the test.  Hell is for bullies,
none the less. 

Letting Evil Flourish is a Sin of Cooperation

It was stated in a recent century that the only reason why evils flourish is because
the good do nothing to stop them from spreading.  However, the moment when
you refuse to help stop an evil, it immediately turns you from good to evil.  Such
a thing is a sin of negligence.  Such a thing is a sin of omission.  This is cowardice.

Pontius Pilate's sin was a basically a sin of cowardice.  He cowardly succumbed
to envious religious leaders in Jerusalem who held a jeering mob on puppet strings,
despite the fact that, days earlier, the same people of Jerusalem were welcoming
Jesus in triumph, laying out a trail of palm branches for him.

Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer are not worth anyone's eternal damnation.  So,
why be their puppets, in their obsession with elective abortion?  Marcial Maciel
Degollado and his principle accomplice, Angelo Sodano, weren't worth eternal
damnation, either. So, why would Ratzinger have succumbed in being an accom-
plice to those two priests' sins?  Neither was Adolph Hitler worth damnation, as
if an entire nation should have followed him ... directly into Hell.  In fact, lazy
priests of recent decades who wanted all the commercial outlets to be opened
on Sunday (in regions where such a thing was unheard-of) aren't worth the
damnation, either.  So too is this the case with those who profit from foreign
sweatshop labor.  Why go to Hell for people locked in clinch-fist greed and
who have no intention to share their immorally acquired wealth with you?
Why cooperate with something that will send you to Hell forever? 

Delineating the Cooperation of Evil

There is Formal Cooperation and then there is Material Cooperation.  It's the
Formal Cooperation that incurs sin.  In this era of lax and pampered priests, it
is expected to find the majority of them giving an excuse for every form of co-
operation, including the Sin of Apostasy of Ancient Rome, when a Christian
was excommunicated for tossing incense into a pincer, in worship of the em-
peror, lest he be martyred for refusing to do so.  However, the Gospel  gives
a decisive example of cooperating with evil:  Pontius Pilate.  To him Jesus
said,  "The one who handed me over to you is the one with the greater sin."
Therefore, Christ didn't excuse Pilate.  He stated that Pilate was in the pro-
cess of committing a sin.

In reality, the Scribes and Pharisees were committing the greater sin in push-
ing Pilate to do their evil for them.  Pilate let himself be a puppet on the strings
of envious Scribes & Pharisees who wanted Jesus dead for ousting the
money-changers from the temple Herod had gotten people to rebuild.

Incidentally, the previous Gospel passage shows that the Protestant claim that
God sees all sin as the same is a complete lie.  Protestant after protestant stat-
ed that God sees no difference between murder and stealing a dollar from a
billionaire.  Well, there are varying degrees of sin, according to the Gospels.
In sequence, there are varying degrees of eternal damnation.  Likewise, there
are varying degrees of glory in Heaven.  However, the Protestant view of
Heaven is the Marxist Communist view, where everyone is the same pre-
dictable man in the gray flannel suit ... with the exception perhaps being
the stereotypical TV evangelist wearing a bad pompadour hairdo toupee. 

Concerning the sin of Cooperation

The one who initiates the sin is the "principle agent."  He is the one guilty of
the greater sin, but his formal cooperators are guilty of sin none the less.  Furth-
ermore, if the sin could not materially be committed without the cooperation of
you, and if you are an "immediate agent," you are in formal cooperation.  You
have sinned.  You're damnation will be as immediate if you have no intention
on changing things.

Sin begins in the heart, and not in the senses.  A person's intent can make the sin
of cooperation an act of formal cooperation.  After all, a sinner is a person who
loves evil.  Thus, if you love what is transpiring, no matter what your degree of
cooperation might be, then you are formally cooperating with the sin transpiring.

Official moral theology differentiates cooperators as those who are immediate
and those who are mediate.  Mediate cooperators are those situated somewhere
down the assembly line of the sin transpiring.  They are not front & center,
conducting a chorus of evil.

Consideration of the Sin of Cooperation is an exceptionally important matter.
This is the essence of the Fatima message, and it applies to one of the five
blasphemies against the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  The fifth blasphemy is
the act of dissuading children from embracing devotion to Mary and in seek-
ing to have people hold public contempt for her.  Such a blasphemer is act-
ively attempting to get children to be accomplices to his/her hatred of Mary.
Thus, he/she is the principle agent in this sin.

Incidentally, the Born-again 700 Club world held the most infernal hatred for
the Virgin Mary I have ever witnessed in my life, and it was the "church ladies"
who held the most seething contempt for her.  They were obviously envious of
Mary, as if they were the wicked step sisters and she were Cinderella.  Well, the
Virgin Mary is not a fairy tale.

The Sin of Cooperation is also paramount in the Nuremberg Trials.  Defendants
there continually pleaded that they were "just following orders."  This defense
was adjudged as no excuse for cooperating with the crimes of Nazi Germany.

The Sin of Cooperation was the end of Sodom.  It involved complete compliance
with one habitual sin.  All of the town, excecp for Lot's family, was contributory
to this sin.  This made it impossible for there to be ten just men in the city, so as
to assure that God would spare it, as he mentioned to Abraham in whatever type
of mystical dialogue the two entities communicated.

For those unfamiliar, the Old Testament states that God answered a series of ques-
tions that Abraham asked, with the final answer being that God would spare a city
from destruction if only ten just men lived in it.  With the Prophet Jeremiah, it was
merely one just man, when it came to Jerusalem.

When you are cooperating with a Corporate Sin, you are denying Christ before
men.  Now, God the Father only recognizes in a human the qualities that he re-
cognizes in his own son.  In as much, going to Hell consists in God and Christ
saying, "I don't know you."  Thus, all going to Hell consists in being deceived
by the Devil and becoming an entirely unrecognizable foreign entity to God
and the angels. 

The Alleged Vatican II Con Game

At the guest cottage of a Trappist Monastery, a monsignor who co-authored Unit-
ed States bishop statements told me that the Vatican policy at the time was this:

What the laity doesn't know won't hurt it.  Therefore, according to my Vatican-re-
lated source (during a Trappist Monastery conversation), John Paul II elected to
not speak out against certain Social Sins, because, if he did, the laity would be
bound by conscience to disassociate themselves with the social sins.  This would
logically mean that, as long as the laity would be kept in the dark about sins to
which they were cooperating, they would not guilty of the sins ... according to
the Vatican's mind set during the John Paul regime/tenure/administration/papacy.

Now, at the time, it was hard to believe that the Vatican would honor a policy that
perpetuated evil and kept the laity ignorant.  However, in the case of Maciel, Vati-
can bank scandals, and the widespread clergy abuse scandal, it was a plausible al-
legation, coming from a very articulate and relatively young monsignor.  This
particular monsignor was classy and not pretentious about it.

Now, John Paul II vaguely hinted on two known occasions about the sin of co-
operation.  But, he didn't have the laity take action to end such sin, in specificity.
The visiting monsignor made mention of material cooperation as if it were a loop-
hole that would spare the laity of eternal damnation.   The response to this is ob-
vious, even if the monsignor did not tell me the truth about the implied Vatican
policy:

The most famous scriptural passage concerning this is found at Hosea, at C. 4, V 6:
My people perish for want of knowledge!   Since you have rejected  knowledge, 
I will reject you from my priesthood.   Since you have ignored the law of your 
God, I will also ignore your sons.  One and all, they sin against me, exchang-
ing their glory for shame"

Plus, in a locution (a supernatural vision of words only) Christ spoke to Bless-
ed Alan of La Roche during a Mass, saying, "How can you crucify me again
so soon?  You  crucified me once before by your sins and I would willingly be
crucified again rather than have my Father offended by the sins you used to
commit.  You are crucifying me anew, because you have all of the learning
and understanding that you need to preach my mother's Rosary, yet you are
not doing so.  If you only did this, you could teach many souls that right path
and lead them away from sin  -  but you are not doing it and so,  you yourself
are guilty of the sins  that they commit."

The essence of the sin of cooperation is:  "You're guilty of the sins they commit."

Concerning the unconscionable entities in the present church, they will chirp out
that they are only in material cooperation with present evils, and therefore, are
justified in their cooperation with said evils.  Well, the first moment when you
know that an evil is transpiring, your conscience becomes placed on notice.
Unconscionable priests fail to realize that, at the very least, they are guilty of
cowardice and negligence, in declining to oppose the corporate sins in their
societies; those such as slave labor merchandise importation.

Plus, the material wrath of God will materially visit them, when the wrath is
launched.  Even those in material cooperation during the Nazi regime had the
bombs from British Lancasters hurl down upon them night after night after
night afer night.  In fact, it was not only those in formal cooperation with Im-
perial Japan's sins who found themselves immersed in the firestorm of Tokyo.
Those only in the state of material cooperation burned to death , too.

In discerning if a corporate sin involves the laity's formal cooperation of it, an-
swer the following:

1} Is the evil institutionalized to the point of being an habitual part of society,
     whereas it is accommodated and regarded as a civil right?  2} Is it possible
     to end the evil with societies' boycott of it?  3} Does the society know that
     it's occurring?

Society must make the effort to end any known corporate sin, or its people be-
come guilty of at least the sin of omission.  In their silence, the present bishops
have been engaged in sins of cooperation that will send the wrath of God rock-
eting throughout the societies where the corporate sins flourished.  The wrath
will consume the criminally negligent bishops who profiteered from sins to
which they remained silent.  They benefitted through tax-free collection bask-
et proceeds and through corporate donations.

People who make money through corporate sin sometimes toss a few dollars or
a check into an occasional collection basket.  For a priest to accept such money
is for him to accept blood money, especially when the money came from corpor-
ate entities who habitually suck the blood of severely underpaid sweatshop em-
ployees.  The vengeance of God will eventually be at each negligent priest's rec-
tory door step.

In the 1970's, the typical Gort Smith Arkansas seamstress made $14 an hour, ac-
cording to a payroll clerk who once worked there.  Recently, Latin American
women sewed various NFL jerseys for pennies per jersey.

You can attend church all you want.  But, if you go to a job that requires you to
be an accomplice to at least one mortal sin, you are living a lie.  You are the ser-
vant of mortal sin.  Sin therefore defines your income and Hell will be your final
paycheck.  In as much, there were specific reasons for the Virgin Mary's interven-
tion at Quito, La Salette, Fatima, and Akita.  Life isn't a joke.  There are serious
consequences in the end.

Do you really think that God will bless any home gotten through money made by
cooperating with a sin?  God gave no such blessing to the homes of Nazi Germany.
Instead, that nation was turned into a land of bomb craters and massive wreckage.

In similar fashion, God gave no such blessing to an Imperial Japan that was utterly
decimated by the Americans.  This included decimated homes purchased through
employee income that contributed to Imperial Japan's crimes.

Do not be deceived.  God is not mocked.  Neither mocked are those who were vic-
timized by the corporate sins to which you cooperated.  If you want peace, you
must first establish justice (fairness.)  The lack of justice yields the destiny of
damnation.  If you go to Hell, it means that you were a living Hell to others in
this life.  Not helping those who were victimized by your own sins of coopera-
tion made you a living Hell to those you refused to help.  As St. James wrote,
those who see good to be done and do not do it sin.  You can read all the kissy-
poo Vatican II devotional books you want.  If you don't cease your sin of co-
operation, all will be for naught.

There's an interesting thing about those who don't want to hear about Hell.  Hell
is an extremely loud place a person there hears forever.  Ironically, those who do
n't want to hear about Hell will hear it forever.  In fact, there is the type of person
who figures that his/her actions are not sins, simply because God didn't immediate-
ly hurl lightning bolts upon that person after the person committed sinful actions.
Such a person follows nothing more than animal instinct.

The lingering presence of elective abortion proves that all church leaders of recent
years were complete failures who refused to do what was necessary to end a sin that
cries to Heaven for vengeance.  Being that they are poor leaders, they should be re-
moved from office and replaced with people who won't be dead weights in the aisles
of the church.

Included in the list of corporate sin and social scandal is the commercial retail
desecration of Sunday in populations that were christened.  The sin of Sabbath
Desecration is a sin against ecology.  The sin of Sabbath Desecration is the main
issue in the message of La Salette  . . .  in the apparition which prophesied the
agricultural disasters of 19th Century Europe, as in the potato famine, the wheat
crop failures, and the grape crop failures.  The La Salette message applies to the
modern world as much as it applied to mid-Ninteenth Century Europe, because
God is changeless.  The God of the 19th
Century is the same God of today.

If you don't want to remain on modern society's death march to Hell, stop march-
ing in that direction.  After all, it's embarrassing to go to Hell on account of suc-
cumbing to peer pressure.  Nerd boys do that.  The La Salette article linked below
will help a bit.  However, if you're a innate coward, as in the type mentioned in St
John's Apocalypse, then nothing will help you at all, until you surgically remove
the propensity to cowardice.

A tip on doing so goes as follows We all get scared in similar situations.  Cowards
run, while the heroes go about their tasks, despite feeling intense dread.  Heroes have
an element of inspiration absent in cowards, and they don't have self-centered tunnel
vision.  Cowards only think of themselves.
============================================================