January 22, 2019

The Hail Mary: The Cadence of Angels


She lived in a nation known for strife, grief, and warfare throughout a continuum of cen-
turies.  This included the film documentary centuries of modern times.  The irony is that
the capital of her nation was called, the City of  Peace.   Her locale was a valley hamlet
which saw its share of strife in 67 C.E., but which wasn't mentioned in historic texts dat-
ed before 200 C.E.   None the less, the artifacts of her general locale date back 2,000
and 9,000 years.  Her home showed signs of life throughout a succession of centuries.

She never married into a wealthy family.   Nor did she hold office.   Coffers of treasure
were not hers to possess.    In fact, this woman never possessed anything that would be
regarded today as empowering to women.   Yet, her power now exceeds that of every
women who ever came to be.

She was called blessed among all women by the wife of a high priest who was given
an unexpected revelation about her.   In response, the lady whose soul reflects starlight
said,  "... From henceforth, all generations will call me blessed, because he who is
mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name."  

For those unfamiliar, the Anglo Protestant Bible Belt World views Mary as a very
unwelcome presence so much so that it's adherents declare that having recourse to
her is evil.  Yet, the Bible expressly states that all generations will call Mary blessed.
This means that, if you don't call Mary blessed while claiming that the Bible is the
revelation of God, then you are hypocritically anti-Biblical.  Of course, those who
claim to be "Biblical" ignore pivotal passages of the Bible.

Her own words were proven to be prophetic.   Prayer books, theology books, art, In-
ternet sites, film, church structures, religious orders, and the supply of rosaries that
were made throughout the centuries prove that a representation of humanity in every
generation after Mary has called her blessed.

The phenomenon of Mary has not been duplicated.  Nor has the envious hatred of her.
Mary has been treated as an enemy of God and a nuisance of mankind in specific sub-
cultures.  Thus, there is the duty to defend her.  As a general rule, the more vulgar the
subculture the more the hatred toward the Virgin Mary.  After all, it is written,  "Lust
indulged afflicts the soul."   In light of this, it's no mystery as to why certain people
get almost convulsive at the name of Mary.   This is because darkness is incapable of
comprehending light, especially when it's gentle starlight.

Before the age of wall to wall profanity, it was commonplace to associate the name of
Mary with Catholics.  Today, however, the name of Mary conjures images of people
claiming miracles in streaked windows and on pieces of toast.  The modern mind has
become so Orwellian that people now claim profane things to be sacred.

Catholics in years past were accused of idolatry for wielding rosaries and keeping de-
pictions of Mary in their living quarters.  Yet, the accusers would think nothing of hav-
ing their favorite singing star poster posted on a wall or a billboard.  In addition, it has
been the most vulgar element of humanity who has obsessed itself with insisting that
Mary didn't remain a virgin, as if being the Ark of the New Covenant was a fleeting
and insignificant thing ... as if the Law of Moses (which was the reason why Mary
was to remain a virgin) had zero significance during the Jewish woman's life. 

In light of all the hatred which has been hurled at Catholics for their friendship with
Mary, the act of defending devotion to Mary is always the order of any day in our
tattoo-ridden and body-pierced society.   Defending the sanctity of Mary is equally
in order. 

Catholic Spiritual Radar, aka Catholic Instinct

The reason why Catholics have a reflex action to be respectful and affectionate to-
ward the Virgin Mary is because they see her as beautiful and intriguing as a starlit
night.  What decent person would shun the beauty of a starlit night?  ANS:  Those
immersed in animal instinct.

What real man would be too numb and too stone cold to be moved by the Virgin
Mary?   What person in need of counsel would not have his innermost recesses in-
fluenced by her philosophic touch?   After all, she saw her son die in a mob scene.
She had to take the same son to Egypt at the beginning of his life.  At this hour, she
continually sees multitudes of humanity speaking curses against her son, as well as a
line of mockeries against him, especially when the name of Mary Magdalene comes
to the fore.   A masterpiece of conversion has been turned into a gossip column article.
Such a thing is as profane as claiming that a streak in a window is a Marian apparition.

Go one step further.   Consider the three nations of continental Europe most known for
Catholicism in their histories.   Namely, they are Spain, Italy, and France.  Religion may
be laid waste in vast sectors of those nations today, but the Roman Catholic influence
molded the personalities of those nations  for centuries.   Now, what general observa-
tions are stereotypically associated with the rose garden Italian, the Frenchman, and the
Spanish gentleman?  ANS:  Romantic tendencies, suavity, charming gentlemanship, the
rose garden ambiance, the poet, and things similar.  In light of this, what influenced this
reflex action found in the stereotyped suave Latin gentleman?   ANS:  The Charisma of
the Virgin Mary and devotion to the saints.

The Words of God the Father

Angels are messengers of God.  At the Annunciation, Gabriel was speaking the words
of God the Father when he said, "Hail, full of grace.  The Lord is with You.  You are 
the most blessed among all women."   In light of this, it is clear to see that anyone who
hates the Hail Mary hates God the Father, being that he was the first person to spirate
those words, through Gabriel.    In a similar fashion, those who recite the Angelic Sal-
utation of Gabriel take on the power of the Eternal Father.

Heaven recognizes a sin against God known as blasphemy against the Immaculate Heart
of Mary.  Such blasphemy is a sin against the Will of God, as well as a simultaneous sin
against the mind of God and the power of God to do great things in a humble lady.  The
first person to commit this type of blasphemy was Lucifer, shortly before he departed
from Heaven like a bolt of lightning.

The correctness of Marian devotion finds itself in the biblical account of the crucifixion,
when a dying Christ said to the only apostle remaining near him, "Look, your mother."
In light of this, anyone who condemns devotion to the Virgin Mary condemns the Christ
who assigned her to be our mother.  Needless to say, the condemning person kills every
facet of infatuation with life.   The lesson is that a person who identifies himself as a
Christian, yet who hates the Virgin Mary, is often a danger to society ... proven through
historic events.
______________________________________________________________________

January 20, 2019

The U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause and the actual dynamics between Church & State

If there were absolute separation of Church and State in America, 
there would have never been chapels on United States military bases.
 In light of this, consider the following commonly encountered scenarios:


1]  The police officer hired by the State directs traffic solely for the benefit of
      parishioners leaving a Sunday church service.  If there were the absolute
      separation of Church and State, there would be no police officers directing
      church traffic anywhere in America, and there would be chaos on State roads
      on Sundays.

2]  The detective hired by the state investigates the allegations of clergy abuse com-
     mitted upon parishioners.  If there were absolute separation of Church and State
     in America, the molestation of altar boys would have gone unchecked and have
     become a pandemic.

3]  In 1844, Philadelphia-area Protestants, in their paranoiac hatred of a pope they
     never met, torched a Catholic Church.  In fact, they literally fired a canon at it.
     In response, soldiers employed by State rallied to the protection the Catholics
     who, at the time, were hated with seething ferocity by certain Protestant sects.
     If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, there would have
     been either a massacre in Philadelphia or the start of a literal civil war there.

     The Conclusion is that the First Amendment Establishment Clause requires the
     State to make sure that its citizens are able to freely practice religion. 

     In the alternate:

1] Catholic, Quaker, and Episcopalian schools fulfilled the job of the State in edu-
    cating students in non-religion subjects such as mathematics, science, history,
    art, and literature.  This means that there are religious institutions functioning
    as the State five days a week.  After all, the State enacted mandatory school laws
    and religious institutions fulfilled said laws by educating many youth above and
    beyond the topic of religion.
                                                      Added note:

               When a private entity acts as the government, in being the surrogate
               of said government, it's known as "acting under the color of law."
               You can sue the federal government for a civil rights violations com-
               mitted by a private institution acting under the color of law.

2] Catholic and Protestant charities of varying sort fulfill the job of the State in going
     to the aid of hurricane victims, even to the point of receiving federal dollars in the
     process.  In fact, the Catholic Church, for years, received taxpayer dollars through
     social service government contracts.  In this capacity, churches have acted under
     the color of law.  Churches have become the surrogate of the government.

3] Catholic, Jewish, and Protestant medical facilities act under the color of law each
     time their facilities treat a patient sponsored by the medicaid program.

4] Catholic, Jewish, Moslem, Protestant, Hindu, etc, chaplains are hired by the U.S.
     government, to care for the spiritual well-being of U.S. military personnel.  They
     are not hired to establish any one religion.  Rather, they are paid to secure the re-
     ligious rights of the military personnel who need chaplains, in order for the religious
     rights to be something real.  During WWII, there were priests at the war fronts giv-
     ing last rites to mortally wounded American soldiers and to anyone else caught in
     the line fire.  The United State government funded the priests, the chaplains behind
     the front line, and the military chaplain in the States.
 
    Other observations involving the relationship between Church and State:

1] The television broadcast of Midnight Mass somewhere on Earth is governed by
     the FFC in America.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State,
     the church would have to intrude on frequencies designated by the government,
     in order to broadcast to humanity.

2] The private jet which flew John Paul II and Benedict XVI throughout portions of
    America flew solely under the law of the FAA.  If there were the absolute separa-
    tion of Church and State, the jet carrying a pope would have crashed into another
    jet liner eventually, or else such a jet would have created aerial havoc.

3] The priests and nuns made homeless by a hurricane have the right to seek help
     from FEMA.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, then
     priests and nuns would freeze to death during blizzards, drown during floods,
     and remain without shelter after tornadoes. 

In addition:

It is a well known practice to begin a congressional session with a chaplain praying be-
fore the session.  If there were the absolute separation of Church and State, then no
prayer of any kind would be heard in a congressional chamber.  It's simply that the re-
ligions take turns in delivering the opening prayer in American congressional chambers,
because there is no established religion in America.

The Federal Judiciary Conclusion:  The phrase "Separation of Church and State"
is a misnomer.  Mention of it does NOT appear in the United States Constitution.  Rath-
er, the United States Bill of Rights has the Establishment Clause which forbids the fed-
eral government or any individual State to establish an official state religion.  The same
clause protects a citizen from having his religion outlawed, unless the religion involves
criminal activity.

The First Amendment Establishment Clause guarantees that NO person will have to
support or adhere to a religion to which he does NOT want to belong.  It also guar-
antees that a person willing to adhere to a specific religion will not be required by the
government to violate his conscience in matters of faith and morals, provided that the
matter of conscience is written into the religion's official doctrine. 

One more thing:

If the practice/activity of a religion involves the doing of something illegal, then the re-
ligion is not permitted to practice it.  The example classically used was bigamy.  If a
religion allows bigamy, members of that religion are not permitted to practice bigamy
in the United States.

In the inverse, if an activity mandated by the State is NOT permitted by a person's re-
ligion, then the individual has the right to not be a part of the activity declared sinful in
his religion.  The most obvious example is war and the Quakers. 

In conclusion:

The much controverted United States First Amendment clause is NOT referred to as
the Separation of Church and State Clause, being that there is no absolute separation
of Church and State.  The operative phrase is the Establishment ClauseThis means
that you do not have to join a religion that you don't want to join.  This also means that
you can't force someone to stop practicing his/hers.
________________________________________________________________

January 18, 2019

BBC documentary: Spanish Inquisition Horror Tales Are 99% Myth



For those unaware, the horror story of the Spanish Inquisition came from one
source.  The source was the account of a Protestant who wrote under the pseud-
onym, Montanus.  It was written by an individual who claimed to be a former
prisoner of an Inquisition court.  Thus, it was a work of the most predictable
propaganda, written during a time when the violent & gluttonous Henry VIII
was being painted as a saintly champion of the Protestant Rebellion.

After all, Henry was the one who began British Protestantism on a nationwide
scale, simply because he didn't understand the science of the XY chromosome
and that the father's contribution to a child's conception determines the sexual
gender of his child.  This is why he asked the reigning pope at the time to grant
him a divorce.  This was bizarre, being that the Catholic Church taught from its
beginning in the 1st Century C.E. (or AD,) that marriage is as indissoluble as
the existence of children which come from marriage.  All in all, the era in
history known as the Protestant Reformation was one of the spreading of lies.

It was also a hypocrisy in amassing a propaganda campaign against Catholic
Spain, when, in England, being a Roman Catholic instantly gained for a citi-
zen the DEATH PENALTY.  Yes, Catholic were being made out to be mon-
sters while the British were literally killing them for things as harmless as
sewing priests' mass garments and teaching basic Catholic catechism.  In
fact, the British persecution of the Roman Catholic Church got so bad that.
in Ireland, Catholicism was literally taught in the hedges, and a catechism
teacher was called "a Hedge Master."  It was incredible hypocrisy, squared
and cubed.

In as much:

Any reasonable person can recognize that a tale of super sensationalism is
probably false.  That would be one red flag of the Montanus Account.  The
other red flag in Montanus' horror story is that there 20 different inquisition
courts in Spain.  This means that, at the very least, this Montanus would have
only witnessed 5% (1/20) of the Spanish Inquisition.

In addition, there was no corroborative witness to support Montanus claims.
In the end, the release of the archive files of the Spanish Inquisition showed
the the horror story was an act of state-sponsored libel.

One more very important note:  The Spanish Inquisition only had jurisdiction
over Roman Catholics.  Its "inquisitors" could not summon to court any Jew,
Muslim, Albigensian, Ranter, or Protestant.  Now, the contents of the Secret
Archives of the Spanish Inquisition have been released, resulting in a docu-
mentary exonerating the men of the Inquisition by the BBC, in the land of
King Henry VIII, where being a Roman Catholic received the death penalty.

Take note that it was the BRITISH BROADCASTING COMPANY, and not
a Latin-Mass-Only cult, produced the documentary which exonerated the
men who operated the Spanish Inquisition.  This is the nation that began
the Protestant Reformation on a nationwide scale.  This was the nation
which disseminated the horror story of the Inquisition.  Now, it's the
nation which announced that the horror story was 99% myth, and
the opening of the Spanish Inquisition Archives is the source of
the BBC's findings.

A Must Watch:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhlAqklH0do
________________________________________________

January 17, 2019

An employer's right of conscience is his/her duty of conscience. Morality isn't optional. That's why the precepts thereof are called Commandments.

Business managers' conscientious objection to the HHS mandate is the most important
thing transpiring in America's branch of the Catholic Church.  Think:  A person will be
granted conscientious objection status from the U.S. military, if he can't bring himself
to pointing a loaded gun at another human being.  Yet, a person objecting to pointing
the infamous "pill" in the direction of a newly conceived child is being forced, under
a costly penalty to violate his/her conscience.  This is a serious issue.  For those mana-
gers caught in the middle of this mandate, time has stopped for them . . . proverbially
speaking, of course.  They have been put on the spot, to say the least.

Concerning the mandate, know thisThe conscience is inviolable.  To use coercive
measures, in order to get someone to violate his conscience, is the act of violence.
Ironically, the measures to do so usually involve violence.  This is why the church
has had no lack of martyrs in its ranks.

For those unfamiliar with the United States, HHS stands for Health and Human Ser-
vices.  It's a part of the US President's power structure.  It's a department in the exec-
utive branch of the U.S. government.  At present, an HHS mandate requires business
owners and corporate managers throughout the territories and states of America to
fund for their employees artificial contraceptive devices.  This includes the infamous
pill which can work as an abortifacient up to a week after conception ... in preventing
the actualized egg from being implanted in the nutrition-supplying womb.

Keep in mind that, as soon as an egg is fertilized, it's no longer an egg, as far as concerns
its essence.  After all, in order for anything to develop and grow, it has to be alive in the
first placeThus, once activated, a human egg instantly becomes a human. 

                                          The February 2013 Update.

Being that there were 48 federal lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of the HHS
mandate, a compromise has been reached where religious institutions do NOT have to
be accessories in their employees obtaining artificial birth control devises and the pill
which simply prevents a newly conceived human from being implanted into his/her
mother's womb.  Business managers with consciences are not included.  Thus, there
are religious institutions which need to support back the private industry plaintiffs.
One way is known as the Amicus Brief.  You simply file you concerns on the matter,
in something that resembles a letter or a term paper.  In fact, such a brief slightly re-
sembles the typical judge's opinion ... somewhat.

Now, Hobby Lobby Inc is a bit of a contradiction in that it only objects to providing
the infamous pill to its employees.  All other things condemned in papal encyclical,
Humanae Vitae, will willingly be provided by that corporation's management.  Of
course, Hobby Lobby is known as the House that China Built, in that its manage-
ment has no conscience when it came to importing the merchandise made by ex-
ploited foreign workers.

Incidentally, it is true that nets where placed adjacent to the roofs of at least one labor
compound, in order to prevent further worker suicides.  None the less, there are other
corporations suing the federal government who are more concurrent with church teach-
ing on artificial/synthetic birth control.

The Catholic religion has always taught that it's a sin to accommodate a sin.  Thus, it's
a requirement, in the precepts of Catholicism, to decline to being an accessory to any
mortal sin.  Funding things condemned in the papal encyclical, Humanae Vitae, is for-
bidden in the Catholic religion.  Thus, it's a very serious matter to mandate a Catholic
business manager to violate his/her conscience, in matters of the Sin of Cooperation.
This is why there presently are federal lawsuits, seeking to have the HHS mandate
declared unconstitutional.  It entirely suppresses and negates the Catholic religion in
America.  It still IS a war cry against the Catholic Church, when Catholic managers
are required, under penalty, to provide that which is against the manager's conscience.

Religion does NOT merely exist inside a church, temple, mosque, meeting place, shrine,
or pagoda.  Religion is lived in a person's daily life.  For example, handing over Jews to
Nazi German soldiers was against a lot of religions' moral precepts.  It wasn't merely a
sin, if you did such a thing in a church, temple, meeting place, shrine, or pagoda.  The
same premise applies toward the HHS mandate.

January 16, 2019

Benedict XVI's legacy, as Successor of Peter, as opposed to cardinal

The main article posted here was written late in the Year 2011.  That time was the first
time I called for Benedict XVI's resignation.  That last time was in the Spring of 2012.
I really didn't know that he already decided to resign at that time.  Well, don't think of
his papacy as good-riddens and goodbye.  He was the Successor of Saint Peter and he
did issue some formal teachings.  One of them was basically crucified.  Well, it's de-
fended here:

Preliminary Note, written the day of Benedict's Feb 11, 2013 announcement

When the papacy of Benedict XVI is concluded, the most important axiom which will
have come from his teachings is that there's a major difference between co-existence
and fraternity.  It's a difference similar to the one between day and night.  Incidental-
ly, the Osservatore Romano reported that Benedict resolved to resign as far back as
March 2012, due to how taxed he was during his Latin American trip.

This is a time when papacy-haters come out of the woodwork, like insects.  Incidental-
ly, a pope doesn't abdicate.  He resigns.  Moreover, this is not the time for casting slurs
upon an 85 year old man.  But, it was done, anyway.

It was a curious thing that the announcement was made on the memorial of Our Lady
of Lourdes.  I state this in light of the Secrets of Lourdes which St Bernadette never
put into writing.  However, she inadvertently revealed one of the secrets confided to
her by Mary, in Nevers, France, when she was asked if she were frightened at the
thought of the Prussians marching through France with effective success.  None the
less, it were as if the world was being given a subliminal message, by either Divine
Providence or Benedict, himself.  I can explain that secret at a later date.

Incidentally, Nevers, in French is pronounced, nuh vay ... sort of.  While I'm at it, the
other fatal mispronunciation that Americans commonly make is that of the name of
St. John Vianney.  It's pronounced, vee awh nay, with no accent on any syllable.

The following is the original 2011 article:



In contrast to the Republican Party Platform, there is the 2009 Encyclical

Cartias in Veritate, in its sum total, works well for anyone who doesn't possess an ob-
sessive isolationist mindset often found in rural anti-papal America.  In it, Benedict
and his co-writers convey great insights, in making a sequential presentation of basic
thoughts.  In the beginning part of the encyclical, Paul VI's social justice teachings
are reviewed, along with the social conditions of his time.  Then, at the end of the
fifth Chapter, is the encyclical's major point.  The major point is that you must avoid
having anarchy on the international level by which multinational corporations have
become de facto pirates.

Some individuals who commented on the encyclical did nothing more than present it
in a false light or in a cynical one.  This would logically discourage people from read-
ing it.  This was a loss to many.  The encyclical is worth the read.

Benedict's 2009 text is additionally invaluable in that it differentiates the meaning of
key political and social science words.  It will clear one's perception.  It smashes the
idols of modern thought.  Within it are sections of poetry in prose.  It's a must read for
anyone who has the time to read.  If you can't read well, then at least spot check it.
Read even a little bit of it as slowly as it takes you, so that you can get yourself at
least slightly familiarized with the text which will predictably provide the bench-
mark of the church of the near future.  The text reads as well as does Pope Pius XII's
infallible statement of 1950.  For the record, that infallible statement was one of my
term papers, in college.

In his 2009 encyclical, Benedict seeks to:

1} curb the abusiveness of multinational corporations,

2} prevent mankind from becoming a robot in its own technology,

3} have the church refer to Paul VI's Populorum Progressio as much as Leo XIII's
     Rerum Novarum.

4} to have governments implement the policy of subsidiarity, where the most local
     of entities attend to the most local of needs,

5} have humanity recognize that there is an immediate need for a governing authority
     which comprises a few levels of command and is based on stable (and not on arbi-
     trary) laws to oversee human conduct on a global scale.  This is because the earth
     is now an interconnected set of dominoes comprising instant communication even
     halfway around the world.  The needed government entity will be able to stop ex-
     ploitation.

In the encyclical, Benedict states that there is a difference between mere co-existence
and fraternity.  He additional sets forth that without truth, charity degenerates into 
sentimentality and love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way.

The present Vicar of Christ also stated in the 2009 text that the church has a respon-
sibility toward creation and is obligated to assert this responsibility in the public 
sphere.  Most importantly, Benedict's thesis statement is that the church must, 
above all, protect mankind from self-destruction.

Now, there is a section that I found to be irritatingly redundant in the encyclical, as
I waited for the text to cut to the chase and get to the point.  In fact, there are boring
parts of the text.  The text has merit above and beyond the call of duty, for sure, none
the less.  If it hasn't dawned on you yet, Benedict is the opposite of the conservative
Establishmentarian Status Quo.  It turns out the he wasn't the rottweiler he was made
of to be.

Benedict XVI should retire, so that he can walk out of harm's way during  these times
of increasing tribulation.  He has left the needed legacy for the church of the future.
He is a little too delicate for what is to come.  What is soon to arrive will predictably
include augmented versions of man's inhumanity to man, as well as natural disasters
imposed upon an unnatural generation of mankind.

In addition, Benedict, due to his days as Cardinal Ratzinger, has a target on him.  It
would be for the good of the church for him to resign.  It doesn't mean that you have
burn his texts.  Caritas in Veritate won't be burned by me, any time soon.  None the
less, it still doesn't give the Vatican or any other city state the right to keep the gold
that belongs to the descendants of Jews sent to concentration camps.

The encyclical only mentions a need for a global authority.  It doesn't suggest any
of the logistics in procuring this.  The laws must be moral laws, and this is the only
prerequisite.  Therefore, such a government would not be operated by an Antichrist.
An imposter government would be so.  An authentic government, on the other hand,
would base it's laws one thing The value of a solitary human life.

In response to the various Republican neo-Confederate isolationists who cry out
in their sleep, "New World Order Conspiracy," and "One World Government 
Conspiracy," all the while empowering Dictatorial Maoist China, take note:

Firstly, the correct grammar is One Government World.  They have two words back-
wards.  Secondly, United States Circuit Court case law authority has expressly ruled
that "international law IS a part of the US Constitution."  The Alien Tort Claims
Act of the original constitution (the Piracy Victim Clause) proves this to be the case,
in giving the U.S. jurisdiction over the ills done by a foreigner to another foreigner
in a foreign land.

Oh yes ... news flash ...  Income tax is constitutional, being that it's an amendment in
the U.S. Constitution.  Anything in the United States Constitution IS constitutional.
Whether it's right or wrong is a different story, however.  This has been mentioned
in response to the One World Government conspiracy theorists who usually mention
that income is unconstitutional.

A quick review of the entire U.S. Constitution goes as follows:  It's a framework that
delineates the delegation of powers.  It designates who get to sits in the various cat-
bird seats of government and call the shots.  That's all it does.  It is very amendable,
from A to Z, and it's interchangeable from Z to A.  That is to say, the United States
Constitution was NOT brought down from Mount Sinai by Moses.  It came from
Philadelphia, the former United States capitol.  It's very amendable and extremely
interchangeable.  Caritas in Veritate says much much more than does the US Con-
stitution.

Now, the Republican Party's adaptation of the title, "pro-life" was the adoption of
an obtuse and plosive presentation that causes one to step back.  It's also asinine,
as if someone has the political option to be pro-deathThe law already exists.  It's
only a matter of defining it and enforcing it.  Pro-life isn't a political option.  It's a
commandment.

The Catholic Church adopted the phrase, "Respect Life."  That phrases hit the con-
science.  The Republican Party simply hijacked the Catholic issue of respecting life
and turned it into a parade of majorettes, balloons, and confetti.  To say the least, the
Republican Party failed at any claimed pro-life attempt, short of regulations that suf-
focate abortion clinic administration and which can easily be undone by a lawsuit.

The added irony is that conservative Republicans are likely to cry out "One World
Government conspiracy," all the while mentioning State's rights.  Well, the corpora-
tions that the Republican Party supports has made themselves a world government
of tyrants.  They don't employ people in the States.  They go the India, Bangladesh,
Nepal, China, and elsewhere for the criminally low-paid labor.  They are the One
Government World conspiracy which necessitates the counteraction mentioned in
the 2009 encyclical.  The evil is the Republican Party.

You might be impressed with some of the sections of Caritas in Veritate.  It's flow-
ing literature that contrasts some ideas and then pairs others.  Reading some of it is
like watching Olympic figure skating, on a spiritual level.  Sort of.   In a way.  Plus,
it definitely hints of Aristotelian logic.  As a quick review, Aristotle is the one known
for asserting that the motivation for what you do at present is the final goal you seek
to achieve.  In Caritas in Veritate, Benedict mentions the factors that cause a person's
motivation) and end (a person's destiny.)  So, here is an excerpt of Benedict's legacy
to the church.  In this one instance, he did good.

                                    An Excerpt of Caritas in Veritate 
                                                       Chapter 5                 
                                                   Paragraph 67

In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly
felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations
Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that
the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.   One also senses the ur-
gent need to find innovative ways in implementing the principle of the responsibility
to protect and in giving poorer nations an effective voice in shared decision-making.

This seems necessary, in order to arrive at a political, juridical, and economic order
that can increase and give direction to international cooperation for the development
of all peoples in solidarity.  To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit
by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and to avoid the greater
imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food
security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate
migration.  For all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my
predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago.

Such an authority would need to be regulated by law, to observe consistently the
principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek to establish the common good, and
to make a commitment to securing authentic integral human development inspired by
the values of charity in truth.  Furthermore, such an authority would need to be uni-
versally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for
all, regard for justice, and respect for rights.

Obviously, it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions
from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various interna-
tional forums.  Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in the various
sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by a balance of power among
the strongest nations.

The integral development of peoples and international cooperation require the estab-
lishment of a greater degree of international ordering, marked by subsidiarity, for the
management of globalization.  They also require the construction of a social order that
at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between moral and social
spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and civil spheres, as en-
visaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

Benedict XVI, June 29, 2009

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html 

Populorum Progressio is found here:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html

The Point in Time When the Homosexual Cabal Gained Controlling Interest of the Catholic Church

One of the two parishes where dissenter Cardinal Wuerl permitted
weekly Sodomite Masses, while bishop of Pittsburgh.  Wuerl spent
eight years defying the Vatican in rolling out the red carpet to those
dedicated to perpetuating the Sin of Sodom.
So, what actually happened that put the unnaturally inclined male at the ground zero
of power in that which would soon become the Sodomized Catholic Church?  How
did the homosexuals get to hijack the church which literally traces itself back to the
original apostles? 

The answer goes as follows:

1] As soon as Vatican II was called to order, it was immediately turned into disorder,
    in that carefully prepared texts were immediately targeted for impeachment.  Actu-
    ally, they were targeted for being ignored.  Of course, today the cardinal stationed
    at the United States capitol stated that he WILL IGNORE Catholic Church teach-
    ing, in favor of Sodomy, even though he stated that Catholic Church teaching will
    remain in tact.  The cardinal stationed in Washington DC, of course, has repeated-
    ly been alleged to have been a practicing Sodomite.  He always has been siding
    with Sodomites, and has no objection to violating Canon 915, in giving Holy
    Communion to unrepentant Sodomites, including those who apostacized from
    the Faith of Peter, adhering to a pagan religion in the process thereof.

    In order to learn of Cardinal Donald Wuerl and to view a number of pieces of evi-
    dence against him, in a number of injustices, retaliations, and cover-ups of wrong-
    ful priests, see:  http://www.donaldwuerl.com

2] Throughout the years while the council was in progress, seminary recruiters would
     tell prospective candidates that soon the church was going to permit western rite
     priests to marry.  Therefore, men entered the seminary under false pretenses, as-
     suming that each one would be allowed to have a wife, as priests of old, priests in
     the eastern rites, and married Protestant converts who elect to pursue Holy Orders.

 3] Simultaneously, a number of American men were enrolling into seminaries during
      the Vietnam draft years, simply to avoid the draft.

 4] Vatican II concluded without permitting Western Rite priests to marry.

 5] Eventually, those who entered the seminaries under false pretenses felt cheated.
     Meanwhile, the Vietnam War finally ended and President Jimmy Carter eventu-
     ally granted amnesty to Vietnam era draft dodgers.  During the 1970's a number
     of priests asked to be relieved of their priestly vows.  It had gotten to the point
     where Paul VI made an appeal to all priests, stating that all priests should abide
      by the following commitment, "With Christ I am nailed to the Cross."  This
      statement was even quoted by the Catholic press at the time.  It didn't matter to
      those priest who felt betrayed.  The requests keep going to the Vatican.

 5]  Thus was the Great Egress from ministry.  It left openings.  Guess who filled them.
       _____________________________________________________________

January 14, 2019

Matrimony: The Sacrament of Life


In marriage, you share your life with another.  In fact, you give your life to an-
other, vowing your exclusive fidelity to that one person for life.  This includes
you being willing to give the totality of your life, as you know life to be on this
Earth, in rescue of the other, should the occasion call for it.

In marriage, you transmit life into another (or visa-versa.)  On occasion, life comes
forth from the intimate union thereof, and it usually bears the reflective marks of the
love shared or the love absent between you and the one to whom you vowed your life.

This brings us to one conclusion.  In addition to rule of you and the other person
having to be either not-yet-married or widowed ... the only person you can moral-
ly marry is the one person you love more than life itself.

If you are engaged to be married, and you do not love your fiancee (fiance) more
than life itself, then cancel the wedding.  If you do not cancel it, you will eventual-
ly be engulfed in some habitual form of evil or another, making a more in-depth
mockery out of the Sacrament of Matrimony.  Quite frankly, if you are going to
be taking marriage vows with someone whom you do not love more than life it-
self, then you are already making a mockery out of marriage..

1 in 25 priests vs 1 in 1,095 teachers ... out of bounds

                    In Covering Up the Long-term Sexual Abuse Scandal
                                    by means of distorting the statistics
_______________________________________________________________

                  Keep in mind that this article is an act of conscience by which
                 Doctor of the Church, Saint Francis de Sales, expressly stated:

                       It is an act of charity to cry out against the wolf                
                          when he is among the sheep, wherever he is.

                               
(Introduction to the Devout Life, III, 29)

          This includes deceptive wolves in New York City and Washington, DC
_______________________________________________________________

The latest trick of the more unconscionable members of the hierarchy is to make the
sexual abuse of minors look like a common occurrence in the general population at
large.  However, the records show that such abuse is distinctive to the Vatican II era
church and pockets of the priesthood in the 1950s.  That is to say, it's distinctive of the
Hijacked and Sodomized Catholic Church which still needs a major house cleaning to
be performed within it.  The con game consists in claiming that persons of all industries,
all professions, and all walks of life sexually abuse youth with a frequency no less than
that of Catholic priests of recent decades.

Timothy Dolan of New York went as far as claiming that teachers molest youths ten
times more than do priests.  In fact, he stated that parents molest their own children
more than priests do.  This pair of statements is completely invalid, because there are
excessively more teachers and parents in existence than there are priests.  It's the per
capita percentage that determines which sector of society is the one most dominant in
scarring children and adolescents.  So keep in mind that it was discovered that the rate
of NYC school teacher abuse of various degrees of severity of it  was 1 in 1,095, in
2010.  The rate of abuse committed by priests, between 1950 and 2002 was 1 in 25.

There are, at present, approximately 41,500 Catholic priests in active ministry in the
United States.  In contrast, there are 1,729,000 kindergarten and elementary school
teachers in the U.S.  There are 2,388,500 American teachers when you add middle
school, and there are 3,476,200 school teachers in the U.S. when you add second-
ary school teachers.  In light of this, keep in mind that secondary school is attended
by youth mostly under the age of 18.  Now, compare the number 2,388,500 to the
number 41,500.  In fact, look at the stats again:

 K-8 School Teachers   2,388,500   Do you see the sleight of hand deception?
Active Catholic Priests      41,500    Is your intelligence insulted yet?

K-12 School Teachers  3,476,200   Do you see the blatant disparity?
Active Catholic Priests      41,500   Do you see how Dolan thinks you're an idiot?

Now for the Unconscionable Manipulator, Cardinal Donald Wuerl

Wuerl was recently a guest writer for the Washington Post.  In his article, he stated
that 65,964 youths across America were sexually abused in 2009.  He then stated
that this was a sobering number, making himself look like a caring man.  Wuerl also
made it look as if there were a pandemic of sexual abuse transpiring throughout the
United States, as if every walk of life were regularly engaging in the sexual abuse of
youth.  Wuerl made it look as if sexual crimes of  priests were not disproportionate
to those of the rest of the population.

Of course, Wuerl failed to delineate the types of sexual abuse and the age group dis-
tribution thereof, as well as the demography of sexual abusers..  Nor did Wuerl state
ratios and percentages.  This means that Wuerl is either a lazy journalist or a deliber-
ate deceiver who wants the facts hidden from you.    Very simply, Wuerl failed to
state that there were 65,964 youths reported as having been sexually abused in a
nation of 74,500,000 youths under the age of 18.

This means that 0.000885 of the youths of America were reported as having been
sexually abused during the Year 2009.   This translates into 1 out of every 1,129
youths.  This also translates into an approximate .09% of the minors in a nation the
size of a continent..  Now, this is NOT 9% of the youth.  Nor is this even .9% of the
youth.  Rather, it's  .09%.   "Point zero nine percent."   Observe:
  
Total U.S. population of youths between 0 -17 years of age ..... 74,500,000
     Youths reported as having been sexually abused in 2009 ............ 65,964
        Youths NOT reported as having been sexually abused ..... 74,434,036

Visualize this once again

NOT reported as having been sexually abused ... 74,434,036
         reported as having been sexually abused .......... 65,964

Finding a sex abuse victim is like finding a needle in a bail of hay, as opposed find-
ing it in an entire haystack.  Wuerl made it look as if there were a young sex abuse
victim on every block in every town in America.  Predators are much easier to en-
counter, being that they will hunt for youth, by targeting the places that the young
frequent, such as CATHOLIC CHURCHES.  In as much, Wuerl exaggerated, in
using an unconscionable diversionary tactic.

http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/pop1.asp

In his article, Donald Wuerl gave tips on what to do.  However, all the tips were
garden variety and common knowledge.   He contributed nothing new.  This is an-
other indication that his intention was to create a diversionary tactic and not to give
humanity rarely known expert knowledge. 

Proof that This Was a Deliberate Diversionary Tactic

The article made the deceptive archbishop of Washington look like a caring man
who stepped up to the plate to offer expertise on the subject, even though he gave
only common knowledge in his tips.  Wuerl's deliberate deception is proven in the
fact that he neglected to mention the number of neglected youths ... of those left to
experience hunger pangs and loneliness on a regular basis.  So, why did Wuerl men-
tion sex abuse casualties and not the casualties of neglect?  Some neglect cases end-
ed up as fatalities.   These cases are heart rending, yet Wuerl seems to care not.

The probable answer as to why Wuerl kept silent about the other forms of abuse
is that disclosing their numbers will make sexual abuse look like much less of an
occurrence.   In the process, Wuerl's diversionary tactic will have less impact when
people realize that the sexual abuse of children is not the pandemic Wuerl made it
out to be.   In as much, here are the 2009 stats on the other forms of child abuse:

Neglect  ...................................    543,035    Wuerl was silent about this statistic.
Physical Abuse  .......................   123,599     Wuerl ignored this painful one, too.
Other Abuse  ............................     66,487     Wuerl never defined what this is.
Sexual Abuse  ..........................     65,964     00.09% of total youth in America.
Psychological Maltreatment  ...     52,532     This is shear terror to any youth.
Medical Neglect .......................    16,837     This is much like physical abuse.

Wuerl also IGNORED the millions of youths locked in sweatshop labor, slave field
work, and even military service throughout the world.  This number is the highest of
all forms of abuse.

In his relatively recent Washington Post article, Cardinal Donald Wuerl's apparent
objective, so it seems, was to use the Washington Post as a dupe, in order to divert
attention away from the inordinately high number of molester priests, and to make it
look as if  "everyone's doing it," when it comes to the sexual abuse of minors.  Well,
everybody's not doing it.  Firstly, it's an unnatural act not common to humanity.  In
order to do such a thing, a person has to already be perverted in his senses and in-
clinations.  Therefore, it isn't a common occurrence for the young to be molested,
as Wuerl was making it out to be.

There was one more thing that the article had the effect of doing.   It served as a di-
version to the adult homosexual activity between seminarians, lay religious known as
brothers, priests, and bishops, as was indicated in the church-approved Marian ap-
parition of Quito, Ecuador.  The article also diverted attention away from the semi-
narians who were sexually harassed and even assaulted. 

Another sign That He Was Deliberately Performing a Diversionary Tactic

The first paragraph of Wuerl's article comprises three sentences and one introduc-
tory heading.  Yet, Wuerl obsessively posted the same one web link three times in
that one small paragraph.   The redundancy was a blatant give-away, revealing an
individual who wants you to go to that particular site only.   The problem with the
web link which Wuerl provided is that it takes you to the main page, and not to
the exact page were one can view the number 65,964.   Therefore, in his article,
Wuerl puts the reader on a wild goose chase. 

A Manipulation and then a Blatant Folly in the Same Paragraph

Cardinal Wuerl stated that many parents were clueless that their children are even
at risk in their own neighborhoods.   Well, according to the true statistics, it isn't
probable that children are regularly in danger in their neighborhoods.  Therefore,
Wuerl is marketing fear, thereby diverting attention away from molester priests.
However, it is true that parents and legal guardians are sometimes the assailants.
Wuerl's article never admits this.   Thus, Wuerl presented a propaganda article
and not an informative one. 

An Additional Propagandist's Lie Told about Wuerl

It was falsely stated at another site that Wuerl had a strong sexual abuse policy for
25 years.   Firstly, there was Donald Wuerl's triple cover-up of Wolk, Pucci, and
Zula.   There was the re-admittance into the ministry of John Hoehl, and then there
was the musical chairs cover-up played with Edward Huff, between St. Louis and
Pittsburgh.  There was also the accusations against a Father Donald Sotak who re-
mained in Wuerl's good graces, while his credible accuser was harrassed out of
diocesan ministry.  Plus, there was the first allegation against a Fr. John Wellinger
which, according to electronic communications shown by its recipient, fell on deaf
ears.

Even at the start of the Year 2002, Wuerl had "several" priests in active ministry who
had credible allegations of sexual abuse attached to them.  He gave those priests free
rein until the media exploded with news of the many cover-ups of Catholic bishops.

Even before the Year 2002, there was the Torquato Retaliation that Wuerl ratified,
concerning a former personal secretary who spent years not keeping his hands to
himself.   This isn't all there is to mention, such as the fact that, in 2002, a Petition
for a Writ of Certiorari was filed at the United States Supreme against Wuerl's
Pittsburgh diocese.

The Other Deception in Guest Writer Wuerl's Article

The other deception in the article was Donald Wuerl's photograph.  The angle of
the shot was a steep incline.  This means that it looked as if a photographer of aver-
age height photographed a 6'2" person.   Thus, in his disingenuous sleight of hand
article, Wuerl was trying to make himself look like a giant among men, even in pho-
tograph form.   In tiny Donald Wuerl's case this is an habitual lie, being that he has
obsessively made himself look much taller in his photos than he is in real life.

Now remember, when Wuerl fraudulently makes himself look much taller than he
is, he is trying to intimidate you into never questioning his public sins of negligence,
his policies, and his documented cover-ups.  For the record, Donald Wuerl is a
very tiny statured 5'4."   In fact, the Washington Post described him as a slight
man.   According to multiple yet specific sources, describing Wuerl as a  "man"
would constitute an exaggeration, if and only if those sources were truthful ones.
None the less, Wuerl was the long-term personal secretary of the notorious John
Cardinal Wright.

A long distance runner and former football player once called Wuerl scrawny, in a
voice of shear disappointment, being that he was deceived into assuming that Don-
ald Wuerl was of a stature and athletic ability of a champion.  The long distance
runner was surprised to see how scrawny did describe Wuerl.

In Wuerl's younger days, he literally looked like a clone of  Peter Pan.  More speci-
fically, he looked like the 1962 Jack Frost puppet doll that Domino Sugar would
send to children, in exchange for a couple dollars and a couple box tops.  So, if
you need help in remembering how short and frail Wuerl has been throughout the
decades, remember the phrase, Scrawny Donny, without advertising it.  Just keep
it to yourself, so as to employ a degree of class and discretion.

It gets to be an annoyance to repeatedly see Wuerl continue to disseminate the hoax
about his height, in making himself  look much taller than he is.  This includes him
not objecting to Pittsburgh Post Gazette writer Ann Rodgers lying about his height
and physical stature in print, and in him not objecting to a pagan astrology site who
also stated that he was much taller than he is.  

The height hoax of Wuerl is a sign of long-term vice and vanity.  It's also the sign of
a bishop who wants to intimidate you, in making himself look 6 to 10 inches taller
than he is.  This blatant vice shows extreme immaturity.  Such a person is not fit to
be a bishop.

Keep in mind that it is easy to use an incomplete set of numerical facts to deceive the
public, such as in the sex abuse scandal.  The unconscionable archbishops of today's
church need to realize that there will always be multiple members of the public who
will catch their deceptions, turning such con games into bad public relations incidents.

Wuerl, in his relatively recent article, was basically doing what Joseph McCarthy did
in the 1950s.   Things became so ridiculous during the McCarthy era that a snide slo-
gan developed which stated:   "A communist under every bed and in every govern-
ment office."  Donald Wuerl and Tim Dolan were trying to deceive you into think-
ing that a molester of youth was in every classroom and on every street corner.

The distrust extended toward priests came from the fact that the sexually abusive
ones broke their vows of chastity in the most violent of ways, and then smugly got
away with their crimes a lot of the times, due to bishops without consciences.  How
many priests went through the ordination process while having zero intent to honor
their vows?   Such a thing constitutes fraud.

Back to the Audacious Archbishop Dolan and His Claim

In the Year 2008, there were 35.7 million households that had children living in them
under the age of 18.   Therefore, as an approximation, 74.5 million youths live in one
of 35.7 million homes.  There are approximately 53.5 million youth under 14 years
of age estimated to be living in approximately 27.7 million households.   Therefore,
at least 27.7 million American adults are in close proximity to youths under the age
of 14, serving in the capacity of parent or guardian.  At this point compare the ratio
of teachers, parents, and guardians to Catholic priests.    In light of the fact that some
of these teachers are also parents, we subtract the number of teachers, for the sake
of obtaining a general ball park figure.

Parents or Guardians of Children under 14:  at least 27,700,000
MINUS K-8 School Teachers as of 2008:                   2,388,500
                                                   TOTAL:  at least     25,312,500
                                                                                             vs
                   Active Catholic Priests today:                       41,500

  Parents or Guardians of Children under 18 at least 35,700,000
MINUS K-12 School Teachers as of 2008:                   3,476,200
                                                     TOTAL:  at least     32,233,800
                                                                                                vs
                                                                                            41,500

In approximate figures, there were at least 32 million people in close proximity
to youths under 18 years of age, on a daily basis.  Now, in the Year 2009, approxi-
mately 66,000 youths were reported as having been sexually abused.  This means
that, at the very most, 1 in 484 teachers, parents, and legal guardians were
reported as having sexually abused youths under the age of 18, in the Year 2009.
However, a number of households have both parents in them, making the actual
probability of teacher/parent sexual abuse much lower, such as 1 in 600 or 750.

In contrast, the unsubstantiated & uncertified John Jay report set forth statistics
that amount to 1 in 25 priests having sexually abused youths from 1950 to 2002.
This concerns the United States only.  Of course, in stating that the John Jay report
was uncertified as to its data's accuracy, there was conjecture that some of the re-
ported abusers were not counted, meaning that the true ratio might be 1 in 24 or
even more concentrated.   At the least, we have a ballpark figure, even if the bish-
ops were dishonest in supplying the statistical data.

Now, if all of the 66,000 minors were hypothetically abused by teachers only, then
the hypothetical ratio of sexually abusive teachers, alone, would have been 1 in 52.
HOWEVER, according to 2010 statistics, the rate of sexual abuse amongst New
York City School District teachers was 1 in 1,095.  This included cases of verbal
abuse only and cases involving a teacher and a student over the age of consent.

Of course, the sexual abusers of minors include persons other than teachers, parents,
and guardians.  None the less, the unconscionable members of today's hierarchy are
attempting to hypnotize you into thinking that the widespread sexual abuse commit-
ted by priests is of a frequency no different than other segment of society.   They're
attempting to hypnotize you into believing that the rate of abusive clergy members
is within the acceptable range of conduct.   The answer to this is that one young
sexual abuse casualty is unacceptable.  One adult casualty is equally unacceptable.

In the deceivers Dolan and Wuerl we once again see the truth in St John Chrysostom
stating that the Road to Hell is paved with the skulls of bishops.  This includes 5'4" ef-
feminate bishops known for retaliatory conduct and who obsessively spent decades
deceiving people into thinking that they are tall, intimidating, and aesthetic Rocks of
Gibraltar.

Incidentally, it was revealed by a Pittsburgh diocesan proof reader that the most fre-
quent complaint spoken by Pittsburgh diocesan priests against Wuerl, was,  "Why 
did he get to be a bishop, and not any one of us?"   The answer is that none of
you other priests were the personal secretary of the notorious John Cardinal Wright.

Wuerl rose through the ranks during the era of the Sodomite clergy.  Now, not every-
thing confided to writers and journalists is revealed to the public.  Sometimes, the on-
ly things that the public gets are hints.  Take it from there.

http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos318.htm

http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/acrossstates/Rankings.aspx?ind=100

The Vatican's Most Hypocritical Practice to Date


I personally believe in one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.  It's simply that
the Church today needs a purification of its corrupt clerics.  So, don't call me any
type of Catholic basher.  When a house needs scouring, you don't act as if it's
shimmering.  Let us proceed:

The common practice of the Vatican was that of doing the following, whenever
a complaint against a bishop, his diocese, and/or one of his clergy members was
 sent to Rome.  The practice subjected the complainant to the bishop's retaliation:

                        To send the complaint against the bishop to the bishop,
                            thereby revealing the identity of the complainant,
                       and subjecting that person to retaliation or blacklisting.

Now, if a complaint went to the Vatican about a bishop, it would be logical for any
reasonable person to conclude that the bishop in question was too stubborn to cor-
rect the wrong on his own accord.   Yet, Vatican officials played pass-the-buck.
They played the Vatican Hot Potato game.  This is equivalent to the police trans-
ferring a 911 call to the bank robber who caused the 911 call in the first place.


This is another instance which shows that the prophecy of St. John Bosco and the
visions of St Pius X remain on course, along with the 1931 Rianjo vision conveyed
upon the last surviving Fatima seer, Sister Lucia dos Martos.  The summary of those
prophecies is that the hierarchy is on a crash course to the exact same destiny which
met Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.

Being that history repeats itself, America's future
is a repeat of its painful past  . . .  all at once.

The wave of revolutions which started in Tunisia, the OWS events of 2011, and the
many 2012 petitions of American Southerners asking to secede from the United States
give credibility to these prophecies/visions.  There is unrest and the total lack of peace
throughout Planet Earth.  Yet, the Vatican remains negligent, in refusing to finally per-
form the one collegial consecration which was promised to result in a period of peace
being granted to the world, upon the bishops finally performing it.  In as much, the
crash and preceding sonic boom prophesied is nearing its time of impact.

The hypocrisy of betraying a complainant consists in the fact that the Vatican adopted
a strict code of secrecy within its own perimeters, yet it betrays the confidentiality of
Catholics aggrieved by unjust bishops.  Ironically, this era is one where confessionals
throughout the church are proverbially collecting dust, despite the law of the seal of
confession.  In fact, the confessional is where chaos exists today, in the form of to-
day's spirit of doctrinal anarchy which resulted in a number of priests and bishops
asserting heresies in the name of the Spirit of Vatican II.  These priests no longer
acknowledge certain sins.

Going to confession to a heretical priest is always a crucifixion, when he refuses to
let you confess a sin that he, in his laziness, refuses to admit is a sin.  Priests such
as he are yet another reason why Hell exists.  Priests such as he are one of the rea-
sons why the forces of Hell successfully influence the actions of men on earth.
God has abandon such a priest to his own sins, and in punishment for your sins,
God has abandon you into the hands of that tyrannical priest.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 12, 2019

NAFTA Newt Gingrich and his hatred for the livable wage, and therefore the Law of God

Chicago, city at the lake.
Preliminary Note: Hillary & Bill Clinton are so corrupt, so greed-stricken,
so dishonest, and so murderous in their abortion obsession that ever person
is morally required to disassociate himself for the present platform of the
New Democratic Party which was formulated in the 1980s.  It's no longer
the party of JFK, RFK, FDR, Woodward Wilson, Hubert Humphrey, Scoop
Jackson, etc.  It's presently the Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'n Party who demands
instant abortions after messing up having sex, drugs, and rock 'n roll.

As far as the Democratic Party being the "old-age-pension-protection-party,"
keep in mind that the\ majority of American women 45 year of age and older
voted for Donald Trump.

As far as the same Democratic Party being the working-man's-party, take note
that the working-man's-states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Wisconsin
all went to Trump.  Also keep in mind that Trump did win the popular vote in
30 states, and take note that Hillary's popular vote margin largely came from
the vast California vote.  After all, the large California Hispanic population
feared a witch hunt from Trump's administration.  Hollywood and its sex,
drugs, rock n roll, and revolving-door-divorces wanted nothing to do with
the pro-life candidate.  All in all . . . . . . . . . . . .

If you are a registered democrat, and have the time, you have to push for a change
in the party platform.  I'm a registered democrat.  But, there was no way I was ev-
er going to vote for a Clinton.  In fact, I haven't voted in a presidential election
since 1992, being that there was no morally acceptable candidate to elect.  One
side embraces one set of mortal evils.  The other side embraces the other side of
evils.  Put together the two main United States political party platforms, and you
have shear evil, with a lot of diversionary flag waving done at the political con-
vention.

The Democratic Party is also the Good Ole Boy Southern Democrat Party of
Clinton-style corruption.  In as much, if you look back to Bill Clinton's presi-
dency, his policies were all Republican, except for his military spending poli-
cy and his abortion obsession.   However, at the time, there was no military
threat to consider.

The bottom line is that, just because there is intense fault found in the Republican
Party, it does NOT mean that one is to run to the Democrats.  Likewise, simply be-
cause the Clinton-based Democratic party has gone beyond the sound barriers of
obscenity, it doesn't automatically make the Republic Party platform something
that was brought done from Mount Sinai, by Moses.  Both party platforms have
been intrinsically evil, meaning that there is need of an entirely new political en-
tity and platform.  However, Hillary Clinton's Corruption Machine was so shock-
ing that there isn't the luxury, at present, to oppose the Republicans.  After all, the
enemy of my enemies ends up becoming my friend.

The following was written by me, long ago and far away, while I was living on the
Carolina Coastline.  Chicago and the Carolinas are far-away worlds, for sure.  But
none the less, the moral precepts in natural law remain the same everywhere on
earth, at any time in history.  This is because the Eternal God is changeless and
the Law of the same Eternal God reflects the changeless stability of God.  So,
here is a text on one of the four sins which cry to Heaven for vengeance, name-
ly, "The Defraudment of Laborers of their Wages":::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 
The great error of certain American Catholics is that they think being conservative
means to to be 'an old fashioned girl' or a traditional person.  They then register to
vote as a Republican Party member.

Being conservative, in our label-obsessed society, is to be the opposite of a liberal.
In fact, dating back to texts of the 16th Century, the word, liberal, was used in pol-
ical text.  The opposite of a liberal at the time was a miser; someone obsessed with
hoarding  money, as in being stingy, thereby violating the rules of Christian Charity
&; Redistributive Justice.   Thus, the Conservative vs. Liberal debate only per-
tains to Fiscal Policy; not morality.

However, the Liberal Camp threw the Babylonian and Sodomite lifestyles into their
party platform, making people think that being a sexual anarchist with no self-control
is what it is to be liberal.  No, to be liberal is to be generous ... not someone hording
all the women for himself and making hundreds of thousands of dollars fora speech
that could have been better written by a junior in college..

In today's vocabulary, a conservative is a hoarder.  A conservative is someone
who wants to conserve the money supply to himself.  Such a thing always leads
to a destroyed economy.  This is because all economies become destroyed when
the money supply of that economy gets damned-up by misers who take dollars
mostly made from underpaying foreign workers and the hoarding the money in
overseas tax shelters.  All in all, and in every way, misers kill.  They cling to the
deadly vice of avarice and everywhere around them have their lived destroyed
in one way or another.

In contrast, to be an 'old fashioned girl' or a traditionally minded person is to be
an absolutist, where you believe that God is changeless.  In believing that God is
changeless, one concludes that God's moral code is changeless  ...  not subject to
human whim and inconsistency.

An absolutist believes that morality is objective and NOT subjective.  In as much,
fornication is fornication is fornication, no matter what you call might euphemistic-
ally call it.  Furthermore, a sin isn't a sin only if a person personally believes that it's
a sin.  Sin is not a matter of opinion.  If this is your belief about sin, then you are a
moral absolutist ... not a conservative.

Now, keep in mind that Ronald Reagan was the child of parents who married in
the Catholic Church and then left it for a backward rural form of Protestantism.
Hw was running for president against a genuine Bible-believing Christian who,
as president, did teach Sunday School with the proficiency of an educated mili-
tary man.  So, Reagan had to strike the pose of "moral Christian," in order for
him to have any  means to compete with Carter.  Carter's two failures as presi-
dent were the tragically high interest rates and the Iran hostage crisis.  Add to
this the fact that the post-Vietnam military was getting lax and incompetent.
Reagan's campaigners were able to capitalize on Carter's two failures and
upon Reagan's lies, told during campaigning.  For re-election, the "moral
majority" con game was played.  And it worked.  Reagan lied his way to
two presidential terms.  Gingrich has been riding the Reagan coat tails,
all along.

Of course, in Catholic Church teaching, specifically in St Thomas Aquinas' writ-
ings, 1} every rule has an exception,  2} necessity knows no law, and  3} there
are such things as extenuating circumstances, in cases of ignorance and emer-
gency; not in matters of lust, greed, and narcissistic insistence.  However, in
usual and ordinary circumstances, there is a moral code which does reflect the
changelessness of God.  Such is the code of the old fashion girl.  Such is the
code of the traditional person.

None the less, many American Catholics fell for the carrot-and-stick trick that the
White Anglo Saxonized Republican Party held out, in the name of conservatism,
when it came to abortion.  Of course, the same Catholics ignored the moral obli-
gations in matters of economic and environmental justice, to the point of being
obsessively tunnel-visioned.  The irony is that, unless you end the sins which
lead to abortion, you will never end abortion.  Economic injustice provokes
abortions.

As a couple examples of how absolutism is much different than conservatism,
take two examples of some of the most immoral persons you will have ever en-
countered:  Rush "4 marriage" Limbaugh and Newt "4 marriage" Gingrich.   To
think, the mouthpieces of the conservative movement ignore the idea of marital
fidelity, and have failed in picking the right partner, showing themselves to have
been poor judges of character.  Rather, they have shown themselves to be the
least moral of them all  ...  the least stable  ...  the least disciplined ... the least
mature ... the least honest ... the least self-sacrificing & the most hypocritical.

Rush Limbaugh, after all of his damning of drug addicts, became a drug addict.
As far as goes Newt Gingrich, while he was proceeding to have Bill Clinton im-
peached for extramarital actions, he was engaged in an extramarital affair, there-
by making Gingrich a complete hypocrite.
________________________________________________________________

Republicans have proven themselves to be nothing more than money grabbers,
pretending to be moralists.  Stephen Fincher of Tennessee did this when he pub-
licly rationalized, though the misinterpretation of the Bible, reducing food stamp
allotments in an era of high fuel and food costs, all the while continuing to receive
taxpayer dollars to the tune of $3.48 million, via federal subsidies.
___________________________________________________________________

Of course, the 5'4" flamingly effeminate Cardinal Donald Wuerl who was document-
edly proven to have engaged in multiple cover-ups and multiple acts of retaliation, is
the one who administered the sacrament of confirmation upon Gingrich, and even de-
clared Gingrich's third "mistress" as his true wife.  The three previous women were
declared as never having been sacramentally married to Gingrich, and this may be
true, on account of "immaturity," "consensual defect," etc.   HOWEVER, such a
thing proves Gingrich to be UNSTABLE and unfit for public office in any capacity.
You do not entrust a nation to a man like Gingrich ... ever.

In as much, it is reasonably surmised that Gingrich became a Catholic in name, as
a ploy to obtain the vast Catholic vote in the 2012 presidential primaries.  It's also
reasonably concluded that Wuerl welcomed in an unrepentant Gingrich into the
Catholic church, as a ploy for governmental favors in the future, should Gingrich
become president.

Keep in mind that Wuerl spent many years bringing in a lot of taxpayer dollars
via social service contacts ... government contacts.  Therefore, selfishishness is
suspected as having been Wuerl's motive for welcoming into the Catholic Church
a politician who would continue to campaign for laws that strike against Catholic
moral theology's precepts and obligations.  One such obligation for politicians is
that of procuring the livable wage for their citizens;  not the NAFTA wages that
Gingrich made a common occurrence throughout the exploited labor world.

Newt Gingrich was officially declared a convert, by Cardinal Wuerl.  But, this is
the same Wuerl who allowed Holy Communion to be sacrileged, even to the point
of ousting a priest from his archdiocese for doing his canonical duty, in defending
that sacrament from an apostate lesbian who had no intention of reforming her life.
Wuerl was also found to have a nexus with the homosexual world.  In fact, Wuerl
accommodated the banned "Dignity Masses" for eight consecutive years in two
Pittsburgh diocesan parishes.  Moreover, the conceited elitist of no exemplary
talent refused to speak out against sweatshop labor profiteering, even though
multiple entities asked him to do so ... refusing to do so, despite the fact that
it's automatically Wuerl's obligation to speak out against a sin which cries to
Heaven for vengeance.

If your knowledge of current events is limited to TV sound bytes and newspaper
headlines, the following will surprise you.  It contains Jpegs of documentation
and even copies of original news articles, showing that Wuerl is the opposite of
what the media make him out to be.

http://www.donaldwuerl.com

Wuerl's home for 18 years:  He lived the Marie Antoinette
lifestyle for decades.  He had his cover-ups, retaliations,
and lying propaganda machine.

Needless to say, ever since the second term of the president who tripled the na-
tional debt, American Catholicism was equated with the Republican Party.  It
had gotten to the point where it were as if the Catholic Church's every motion
was dependent upon the approval of the party of George WMD Bush, Dick
Haliburton Cheney, Joe Blackball McCarthy, NAFTA Newt Gingrich, and
Watergate Dick Nixon.

In the minds of those who don't think, there's a vice-gripped nexus between the
Republican Party which gave America its tremendous trade balance deficit and
the Catholic Church.  Of course, this is because the Republican Party claimed to
be pro-life, while despising the livable wage.  So, Catholics were told that it was
their moral obligation to register with the sweatshop labor profiteering party.
The true obligation was for Catholics to join forces with Americans of good
will and start a third party ... or do the strike & boycott regiment of Polish
labor unions and Cesar Chavez.

The reality is that the Republican party platform promotes what the Catholic
Church defines as sins.  The American bishops' polite condemnation of the
Ryan Budget proves this to be so.  Plus, as Pope Franics recently stated, the
American practice of sweatshop labor importation is a matter of slave labor,
a violation of the very freedom that the Republican Party hypocritically
claims to defend.

All in all, the Republican Party was become the slave labor party and 21st
Century America in the 21st Century has become the Confederate South of
the 1820s to 1860s.  Its destiny will be the same as any other culture which
engaged in profiteering from those denied a livable wage.  This because God
is Changeless and God not mocked; especially by Newt Gingrich, the band
leader of NAFTA and the exorbitant US trade balance deficit.

The Gingrich who stole many a Christmas is noted for calling child labor laws
"truly stupid."   He said that employing youth would end poverty in the poverty-
stricken areas of America, or at the least, give adolescents a sense of fulfillment,
instead of embarrassment, in doing janitorial work.  Fire the full-time janitor, said
Newt, and replace him with teenagers.   By any chance,  would this consist in re-
placing the janitor with the janitor's very own children at a lower wage, thereby
making things all the harder on the janitor's family?

You know, one employed adult used to be able totake care of multiple children
and a permanent wife, as well as an elderly widowed parent.  The conservative
Newt seems to want to bring back a different sort of good old day ... the child
labor days.

If you place children in school labs and present them with all sorts of formulas,
laws of dynamics, laws of statics, and unexplained phenomena, they will come
up with cures and inventions.  Making them janitors is the worse investment for
any nation.
Children as hired hands, at cheap rates.
The Way of Gingrich.
However, Hillary Clinton's romp for power was so shocking
that there is no more strength to fight the next wave of evil.

The Imposter in the Sanctuary

The Republican Party has made itself the impostor church, with its pro-military
speeches and flag-waving frills attached, all the while claiming to be the party
of Christ, but failing to acknowledge that Christ said he who lives by sword dies
by the sword.  Now, flag waving and marching to a military tune might have been
fine for Nazi Germans.  But, it is not fit for a 21st Century America tired of pro-
tracted wars against enemies who have zero armored divisions, zero navies, zero
amphibious assault units, zero air force divisions, zero air cavalry, zero infantry
battalions, and zero submarine units.

There is need to exorcise from the American mind the assumption that the Sweat-
shop Profiteer Party is the God-fearing Christian Party.  Did it ever occur to you
why so many people have recently expressed their hatred for Christianity?  Well,
they don't hate Christianity.  They hate money-grabbing Protestantism.  Protestan-
tism is the chattel slave owners' religion.  It's the child slave labor religion.  It's the
foreign sweatshop profiteers' religion.  Thus, when people equate Protestantism
with Catholicism, they end up hating Catholicism, forgetting that it is the religion
of Mother Theresa, John Bosco, St. Francis of Assisi, and Dr. Tom Dooley.

Remember what Mahatma Gandhi said:

                                          "I would become a Christian, if I ever met one."


At present, the abusive clergy scandal succeeded in driving people from the church.
However, ever since the start of the Vatican II reforms, the Catholic Church was be-
ing Protestantized.  It was being morphed.  Thus, the abuse scandal was a cause of
and an effect of Vatican II; the effect being the protestantization of Catholicism.

As far as goes the apparent protestantization of the Catholic Church, the crucifixes
being taken down from central view was one the red flag.  Keep in mind that Pro-
testantism has expressed the same hatred for crucifixes, rosaries, and images of the
saints that demons express during exorcisms.

Protestantism is the anti-religion which claims that you have to do nothing for sal-
vation, even though Christ said, "It is not those who say 'Lord Lord' who enter
my Father's Kingdom, but those who do my Father's Will."

More on Newt

NAFTA Newt Gingrich is, by far, the most accomplished hypocrite of all politicians.
Mika Brzezinski, of MSNBC, did concur on the air, while she was pointing out to
her audience that Gingrich's firm received $1.6 million in consulting fees from the
bailout master, Freddie Mac.  Mr. Fiscally Responsible Conservative received tax-
payer dollars that could have been better spent elsewhere.

Gingrich also called NAFTA a success, because it created low-paying jobs in Mex-
ico, all the while draining jobs from America.  The logic was that the lost jobs went
to neighboring Mexico, instead of China.  Thus, the jobs now out of the reach of the
American worker are not as far out of reach as they would have been, if they went
to Asia.  However, they are still out of reach.  Is there a Republican in existence
who doesn't instantaneously insult your intelligence?   Well, Mr. NAFTA told the
Occupy Wall Street protesters, during a debate, to go out and get jobs.  Okay, but
where?  He sent their jobs to Mexico and China ... and Bangladesh ... and Nepal 
... India ... and ... fill-in-the-blank.  The former Speaker of the House accommo-
dated an economic fad that still hasn't gone out of fashion.

Now, foreign trade is fine, if the foreign workers get paid well enough to occasion-
ally buy American ... and if there is a two-lane highway of trade.  Unilateral trade
with protectionist sweatshop nations causes money to be injected from America in-
to those nations, not to return to America any time soon.  As a result of taking the
precepts of Reaganomics to Maoist China and elsewhere, 5 million American jobs
were lost and the United States ended up being indebted to China to the tune of
$1.4 TRILLION.  Reaganomics was a complete failure on multiple levels.

For those unfamiliar, Catholicism teaches that "defraudment of laborers of their
wages" is a sin which cries to Heaven for Vengeance.  This includes sweatshop
labor profiteering.  Such a thing resulted in a couple of famous encyclicals, such
as Leo XIII's Rerum Novarum.  Therefore, according to Catholic Church teach-
ing, NAFTA is a mortal sin.  In as much, Newt Gingrich has a lot of audacity in
calling himself a Catholic when he has never publicly renounced his NAFTA be-
liefs.  You can only have one or the other, but not both ... a belief in NAFTA or a
belief in Catholicism.

By all appearances, NAFTA Newt Gingrich is nothing more than another hijacker
of the Catholic Church.  Is there a Republican politician out there who doesn't live
a lie?

One more very important feature:  A McDonald job will NOT pay off a five figure
college loan debt.  Why did these graduates go to college, if all that the Republican
economy was going to procure for them nothing more than McDonald's jobs?

At last count, the McDonald's CEO makes 550 time more than a McDonald's front-
line employee, and the CEO of Wendy's makes 1,098 times more.  So, where were
the Occupy Wall Street protesters supposed to go to find jobs that could pay their
college loan debts?  Tunisia? Egypt?  Libya?  Yemen? Syria?  The Ukraine?

Look at the economic stats below, on a Newt Gingrichized America ... on the
damage caused by sweatshop labor profiteering ... thanks to Newt. 

The Economic Downside Effect of
Foreign Slave Labor Profiteering


Foreign slave labor profiteering achieves the following results:

- Increases an offending nation's international trade deficit.
- Reduces the same nation's gross domestic product.
- Deceases the offending nation's per capita income. 

- Provokes the Wrath of the Eternal God, infinitely so.

At this point, view the United States trade balance deficit through
the years, in its trade of goods (not services) with China, alone:

                  U.S. IMPORTS                        U.S. EXPORTS
              from sweatshop China                to protectionist China
        (This is money paid to China)   (This is money paid to the U.S.A.)


2012            $425 billion                               $111 billion
2011            $399 billion                              $104 billion
2010            $365 billion                                $92 billion
2009            $296 billion                                $69 billion
2008            $337 billion                                $69 billion
2007            $321 billion                                $62 billion
2006            $287 billion                                $53 billion
2005            $243 billion                                $41 billion
2004            $196 billion                                $34 billion
2003            $152 billion                                $28 billion


10yr total: $3.12 Trillion                             $663 Billion       
 paid to Slave Labor China               paid to an acquiescent U.S.A.


The NET equals: MINUS $2,457,000,000,000 - That's only trade with China.
This is goods only.

The Total Deficit, as is charted below, is MINUS $5,929,000,000,000. 
This comprises trade with all nations.  This comprises goods and services.

The hypocrisy is that trillions of American dollars stayed in the permanent posses-
sion of the Chinese Communist Dictatorship, in the name of Democracy and
Capitalism, as well as Republican Party Values.

See:  http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2012

Now, view the total 10 yr U.S. trade balance acct, concerning trade with all nations,
in approximate numbers:

          Concerning GOODS only        GOODS and SERVICES


2012       minus $735 billion                     minus $540 billion
2011       minus $737 billion                     minus $588 billion
2010       minus $645 billion                     minus $500 billion
2009       minus $505 billion                     minus $381 billion           
2008       minus $830 billion                     minus $698 billion
2007       minus $818 billion                     minus $696 billion
2006       minus $835 billion                     minus $753 billion
2005       minus $780 billion                     minus $708 billion
2004       minus $663 billion                     minus $605 billion
2003       minus $540 billion                     minus $490 billion


Total:   minus $7.088 261 trillion         minus $5.929 trillion 
                                                          
Refer to the following link: 
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/historical/gands.txt 

In addition, the total/aggregate U.S. Trade Balance Deficit for only the month
of November 2012 rose $6.6 billion, to $48.7 billion (for that one month only.)
This means that the Trade Gap Rate rose by 15.9%.  As I have previously stat-
ed, if this Trade Balance Deficit behavior continues, America will be a political
entity in the history books, compared to the Argentina which, at one time, was
regarded a world power.

rt.com/usa/news/us-trade-deficit-percent-827/

https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/tradnewsrelease.htm

http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/trade-deficit-jumps-159-487-billion-november-2012
______________________________________________________________

Despite the damage Gingrich caused, he showed zero signs of contrition:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/gingrich-calls-child-labor-laws-truly-stupid/2011/11/21/gIQAFYKHiN_blog.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/21/mika-brzezinski-newt-gingrich-occupy-wall-street_n_1105219.html

This is a video, but it also has the written transcript with it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/21/newt-gingrich-callista-gingrich-lies-2012_n_1106153.html
_______________________________________________________________